My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0910_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0910_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:56:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�, <br />:� <br />� <br />� <br />ea <br />DRAFT Minutes of 8/27/07 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Page 25 <br />Councilmember Kough opined that in thinking about a moratorium, <br />he couldn't see how it would help the area. <br />Mr. Darrow clarified that two (2) formal applications had been sub- <br />mitted to-date. <br />� <br />� Councilmember Kough asked that staff alert Councilmembers of in- <br />�� terest in parcels in the Twin Lakes area, rather than having to hear it <br />� r� through the "grapevine." <br />71 <br />�� <br />1;3 <br />14 <br />]5 <br />1� <br />1'{ <br />1� <br />1 �3 <br />��� <br />�] <br />�� <br />�� <br />�4 <br />�5 <br />�� <br />�'� <br />�� <br />�{� <br />��� <br />3] <br />3� <br />3� <br />3� <br />�� <br />�6 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />Councilmember Roe noted that this had been previously requested of <br />staff. <br />Mr. Darrow advised that staff could keep Councilmembers advised of <br />such interest. <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the benefits of community <br />planning, opining that running a process to get wide public input was <br />always a good idea and could avoid issues that had proven contentious <br />in the past. However, Councilmember Pust spoke in opposition to <br />negatively affecting of limiting use and rights of private property <br />owners. �ounc,ilmEmber Pust further opined that, if the City owned <br />the property, it would be a decision internally, but with the property <br />owned privately, and given threatened litigation already, it didn't <br />seem like good policy to establish a moratorium. Councilmember <br />Pust further opined that she was in full support of going full steam <br />ahead with community planning, but questioned the need for a mora- <br />torium to do that planning; and seemed to simply attempt to make it <br />easier for the Council to bring things to a halt to make decisions when <br />it was more convenient for them to do so, rather than being leaders <br />and doing that planning more immediately and not affecting private <br />property owner rights. <br />Mayor Klaus�ng, on a personal note, advised that the Twin Lakes re- <br />development area had consumed a major part of his life over the last <br />five years; and clarified that the purpose of the previous moratorium <br />was not for property acquisition, but to provide for the majority City <br />Council-appointed stakeholder group to meet, and allow for a public <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.