My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0910_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0910_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:56:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
master plan concept created by John Stark exists. If any written legal opinion exists, it <br />should be a part of this analysis. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The Twin Lakes Master Plan, as adopted June 26,2001, and as evidenced by the <br />Master Plan attached to the June 26,2001 minutes, and the Twin Lakes AUAR adopted <br />by Council by on the same date, and also included in the amendment to the Twin Lakes <br />Master Plan, all point to there being only one approved and AUAR studied scenario, <br />scenario # 1. <br />Map 3 and other options are "ineffective" because of the actions of the planning <br />commission and Council. They are not mentioned in Resolution 9904. <br />Accepting Mr. Stark's interpretation of the Twin Lakes Master Plan would also require us <br />to conclude that: <br />• the Appeals Court Decision on the Twin Lakes LLC proposal is meaningless. <br />• the City and the Developers were wrong in slopping the project. Under NIr. Stark's <br />interpretation, the proposal probably would he acceptable, without any amendment to the <br />Twin Lakes ComprehensivePla:� being necessary. Con�eznplate for a moment what <br />ramif�ications that might bring up. <br />For all of the above reasons, the proposed AUAR is inconsistent with the actual Twin Lakes <br />Master Plan, and the 2001 AUAR imbedded in the existing Twin Lakes Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />(Go to ne�t page for discussion of policy issues related to the I'.�r • 2�••'�3� Comprehensive <br />Plan designation). <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.