My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0910_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0910_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:56:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��. POLICY ISSLTES RELATED TO TI� �'.�.T3./B6 <br />COMPREHENSNE PLAN DESIGNATION. <br />1. When is a plan not a plan? <br />If you have four possible scenarios, and also are willing to combine <br />elements of one plan with the other, do you have so many possible plans that you <br />wind up with no plan at all? Does the staff and city council majority want a <br />comprehensive land use plan that is so vague tha� anything they say is consistent <br />therewith gets approved by them? <br />In Mr. Stark's updated AUAR, there is no master plan�e merely shows <br />a ComprehensivePlan Land Use Designation Map as being the "master plan". <br />2. Shouldn't the ComprehensivePlan be "updated" simultaneouslywith the <br />AUAR update? Staff claims consistency with the existing comprehensive <br />plan, but to get there they re-defined the existing Master Plan to <br />their liking. <br />3. Is the P.U.D. /�3�i process a fair one? <br />Consider the land owners in Twin Lakes. <br />What property rights to they have? <br />The city apparently wants to attract another big bucks master developer, <br />instead of incremental projects (as per a newspaper quote of Mayor K�ausiz�g}. <br />Are current land owners (in phase 1) in any bargaining position with <br />prospective buyers or developers? Meanwhile, what can they do with their <br />land? It's been unused for the most part for over a year, and cannot go back to <br />its original use. They must await some future developer making an offer to <br />buy. That could be many years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.