Laserfiche WebLink
�3 <br />�� <br />�� ?.�s <br />3ta <br />3 :T <br />update was prepared between the submission and withdrawal of the Twin Lakes West <br />conceptplan, one scenario incorporatedthis concept plan. <br />On December 4,2006, the City Council directed staff to proceed with DSU in preparing a <br />revised scope of vvorlc for the AUAR Update that would include the creation of a third <br />development scenario. <br />�� ?_�� On May 21,2007, the City Council approved a revised contract and associated scope of <br />3� work directing Bonestroo (formerly DSU) to bring up to date the existing draft of the AUAR <br />�#E? Update, undertake a traffic sensitivity test, and create a third development scenario. <br />� l ?_ I�:1 Bonestroo, with input on traffic modeling from S�', completed a revised draft of the Twin <br />�� La1�es AUAR Update on July ll. <br />�� �� 1 L On July 16,2007, Ciara Schlicting of Bol�estxoa made a presentation to the City Council on <br />4� the revisions to the Dra�t Twin Lakes AUAR Update. <br />4� _' 1� On August 13, 2007, by motion, the City Council directed staff to bring forward the Draft <br />� AUAR Update on August 27,2007, to determine if the document is "complete and accurate" <br />�� and, if so determined, release it for public comment and required agency review. The Draft <br />4E AUAR Update is attached to this report. <br />�� ', l� In preparation for the August 20,2007 City Council Meeting, staff sent postcards <br />�� announcing the opportunity for public comment on the Draft AUAR Update to <br />� t approximately 1,340 households in Roseville located near the AUAR area and posted <br />�� announcements on the City's website and the local community cable access channel. <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�'' <br />�� <br />�� <br />�C� <br />�.' �; On August 20,2007, the City Council heard public comment on the Draft AUAR Update. <br />Attached to this report are ernails and bench handouts prepared by residents. Four <br />community members spoke at the meeting and two sent emails. Comments provided by the <br />residents generally focused on the validity of the interpretation of the future land use of the <br />area; the level of revision to the 2001 AUAR and the extent of analysis of potential <br />environmental contamination, wildlife habitat, scenic views, water quality, and traffic; and <br />the need move forward and develop something within this area. Staff has prepared a <br />response to the public comment on the Draft AUAR Update, which is attached to this report. <br />�S'] �. ]� On August 27,2007, the City Council determined that the Draft AUAR Update was <br />�� "complete and accurate" and released it for a 20-day review by regional and state agencies <br />�a identified in the EQB Rules. <br />�� '. ]� Staff sent out copies of the Draft AUAR Update to the reviewing agencies and requested <br />�� comments to be returnedby September25,2007. <br />_�� <br />�r <br />�i� <br />�� <br />��1 <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� L;r Staff received comment letters from the Metropolitan Council, Rice Creek Water, Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation, and Environmental Quality Board. In addition, Mr. EIw�ara. <br />Sands provided staff with a copy of a letter sent to the EQB and the City's Public Works, <br />Transportation, and Environment Caznn�issior� provided additional comments. Mr. Phil <br />Carlson with Bonestroo prepared a response to the issues identified in each of these letters. <br />(See Attachment A,} <br />'?. L:� Minnesota Rules Section 44103610 subpart SE states: "Unless an objection is filed in <br />accordance wiila item D, the RGU shall adopt the revised environmental analysis document, <br />Page 2 of 3 100807 AUAR Update Adoption <br />