Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />4a <br />i�� <br />�� <br />46 <br />�� <br />�� <br />49 <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�3 <br />5� <br />5.� <br />56 <br />�7 <br />Question #4: I still haven't �eceived a copy of the OSHA audit that I asked fo� last meeting. Is it <br />available? The information was submitted a few weeks ago. <br />Question #5: F�om Bill's 8/31/07 memo ... Page 1, �e; $50,000 "gene�al building �epai�s" — <br />Why did you pick this numbe�? What a�e the p�io�ities fo� which these funds will be spent, o� <br />will they be?? $50,000 is a start. We estimate over $3 million is needed over the next 20 <br />years, which is approximately $150,000 per year. The priorities have not yet been <br />estimated pending the outcome of the Council's discussion on the TT�.'025 priorities. <br />Question #6: F�om Bill's 8/31/07 memo ... Page 2, �e: $SO,OOO IT — I thought the fees f�om <br />neighbo�ing communities paid fo� ou� IT expenses. What po�tion do they pay fo�? Partnering <br />organizations pay for salaries, not equipment. Each organization pays for their own <br />equipment. In Roseville's case, a�aar equipment is currently �'u�ded by surplus monies from <br />the License Center and wireless antenna lease revenues. While these revenues are <br />increasing, they are insufficient to provide for our increasing reliance on technology. <br />58 Question #7: F�om Bill's 8/31/07 memo ... Re the ,�IOOI�fo� supplies — inflationa�y inc�eases <br />54 seem to be included in all unde�lying budgets, so why a�e they included he�e as well? They are <br />�} indeed included in the underlying budgets.. . they're shown separately in the memo for the <br />�i] purposes of highlighting aggregate impacts. <br />�2 <br />�� <br />� <br />�i <br />�t� <br />�� <br />�S <br />6� <br />�U <br />�1 <br />�' <br />i <br />�3 <br />?� <br />7� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�$ <br />;ay <br />��� <br />81 <br />8� <br />R�, <br />�'� <br />Question #8: F�om the City Council Budget Page 27 ... Please p�ovide a S yea� histo�y fo� <br />what has been spent on confe�ences/training as a compa�ison to the �10I� �equested. The <br />amount spent in the past ranged from zero to $3,800 (in 2003). The purpose of the $10,000 <br />is to encourage councilmembers to participate more. <br />Question #9: Frona the City Council Budget Page 2 7. .. What is the $20� fo� pe�fo�mance <br />measu�ement system based upon? Please p�ovide info �ega�ding any bids �eceived o� othe� <br />evidence of the �easonableness of this cost. The amount is based upon the costs associated <br />with participating in the ICMA's Performance Measurement Program. This program is <br />specifically geared towards governmental entities and will allow us to compare to peer <br />cities in our region and throughout the United States. <br />Question ���: F�om the City Council Budget Page 27 ... Why a�e membe�ships a�zcl <br />subsc�iptions ca��ied in the City Council �athe� than in the Administ�ation budget? These <br />memberships reflect citywide emphasis rather than memberships that are specific to the <br />City's administrative function. That being said, it could be moved if desired. <br />Question #11: F�om the City Council Budget Page 2 7. .. Why is the MMKR audit ca��ied in the <br />City Council budget �athe� than eithe� Adrnin o� Finance? It's not a cost of the City's <br />administrative or finance function. It's a city cost that would be incurred even if we didn't <br />have these two functions. That being said, it could be moved if desired. <br />