Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />G <br />7 <br />S <br />9 <br />�a <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14� <br />1�� . <br />Requ�st �'o�r Council Aetion <br />De�artrnen�t A��roval: Maz�ager Approval: � <br />Item Deseription: <br />Background: <br />City Manager Evaluation <br />Da��: 11/05/07 <br />�te�n Nu�be�r: lA.b <br />Agenda Section: <br />� 5 By Couz�cil canse�sus, Cau�cil�ezn}�exs �'�st a�d Roe were d�signatee3 as the subcommittee far <br />� 6 the City Manager evaluatian. The subcozz�z�ittee worlced wiih the City Manager to develop a <br />� 7 pxocess and tiznelzne �ox t�e evaluatzoz�. At ��e �Q122/07 Co�e�l rneeting, a dra�t evaluatia� faz�ra <br />l 8 created by Caunczla�aeznbears Roe and �'ust was preser�ted for City Manager Malinen's six rrronth <br />19 review. Afte�r Council discussior� of �he process and for� they advised they would pravide a�nal <br />24 eval�.ation foarrza . <br />21 <br />22 Changes weare zaaade to the d�raft eval�atian fa�a ti�at was pz-ese�ted at �he 10/22/07 rnee�ing as <br />23 the resu�t of �urt�Zer �zscussions a�ao��.g the ar�embers of tl�e subcom�rzittee arad the Czty �anager. <br />24 The resulting �nal draft is what is included wit�i �his report. T�e pz-��araaary changes fro�-n the <br />25 10/22107 dra�t include th� usc of 6 areas af eval�ation rather t�iarz 4, and di��'ere�t laz�guage under <br />2G the "Respor�sibilities" and "Perforrnance Star�dards" I�eadings %r each area of evalua�ion. <br />27 <br />28 The final evalua�ion form including tihe p�rpase, process, a�id timeline is attached to tl�is �report. <br />29 T%e recomrnended process includes �articipation by City Councilrnembers; Department Heads; <br />30 Advisoxy Comz�issia� Chaiz-s; two Gity staff inernbers ta be selected by the Ci�y Max�a�er, and <br />31 Imagine Roseville 2025 Steer'rng Cnmmit�ee rnernbers. <br />32 <br />33 Councii Action Rec�u�sted: <br />34 Motion �n approve the City Manager evaluation process, �oz�nn and timel�ne as recomine�ded by <br />35 th� subcammittee. � <br />