Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />Special Ciiy Cau��cil Meet�ng <br />Monday, Augusf OG, 2007 <br />Page � $ <br />Ms. Rade� advised tha�, sznce �he dz�a�t was posted on the City's web- <br />site, only on� p�rson (Mr. Sands) had provided comment on the draft. <br />Ms. Radel pxov�ded a Bench Han.dout entitled, "Twin Lakes Business <br />Park AUAR Update," representing a proposed �imeline. <br />7 Counczlmember Roe noted �hat the process provid�d for a 30Tday <br />8 comment period, wi� fnal adoption proposed �'a� October $, 2007 by <br />9 the City Council; fixr�her noting that the Councz� was no� xequir�d to <br />�.0 adopt ii �hen i�'ihey w�re not satisfed, and sought confinnation on his <br />11 sta�ement by Gity At�orney Squires. <br />1. 2 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />1. 6 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />Mr. Squires advised that the City Council had a right to ext�nd tha� <br />period for another 3q days to address spec�fic ques��ons and deve�op <br />additiona� znformation. <br />Discu�sion among Councilmembers related to upcoming ag�ndas and <br />pendzng business be�ore ihe City Council at their August meetings. <br />20 Councilmember Roe, upe�n clari�cat�on by Ciiy Attorney Squires, <br />21 supported receiving public comment at the August 20, 2007 Counci� <br />2� Study Session and sta��'s pxaposed schedule wz�h Ianguage amend- <br />23 ments suggested by Councilmember Pus�. . <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />Public Cvmment <br />Al Sands, 2612 Aldine <br />Mr. 5ands provided another b�nch handaut. <br />29 N�r. Sands objected to staif attempting ta impose tzme �imits �or public <br />30 commen�s and indicating that the drafi dacument was "complete and <br />31 accurate" when additional input would be caming £�om public com- <br />32 �n�nts. <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />3'7 <br />38 <br />39 <br />Councilmember Pust clar�fied thai the document was bezng prepared <br />�'or submission and was as "eomplete and aceurate" as a dra� could <br />be; with the City Council fu�1y understanding that they would be re- <br />eeiving addi�ional comment, and as indicated, those would be inco�r- <br />porated into considerations far a final documen�. <br />