Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 BACKGROUND <br />2 4.1 Section � X03.021D (Cul-de-sac Reductio�s) of the City Cnde currently sta�es: Reduction <br />3 In Right of Way Cul-De-Sac Dirnensions: If the follawing cr^ite�ia a�e me% the Public <br />4 Wo�1�s Di�ector rytay appNave a reduced right of way n� alternative cul-de--sac desi�n. �n <br />5 all cases, the fnininaum culWde�sac dian�ete� sha2l be eighty feet (80 ) for pu�-pnses of <br />6 enze�^gency vehicle access. <br />7 I. Excessive itnpact to adjacent properties — enc�oachment on hotne and principal <br />8 structu�e. <br />9 2. �'mpact to ponding areas/wetZands — requiYing pond o�^ wetland alteration. <br />1� 3. Rest�ictians of existing right of way — substanda�d right of way less than standaYd <br />11 sixty feet (GO ). <br />� 2 4.2 On �ctobex $, 2007, Raanrasey County District Court J�d�e issued a ca�rt order in regards <br />13 to Boryczlca v. Ci1:y of Raseville. Zn t�ZZS arder ihe jud�;e �led ih.af the City hac� been <br />1� iz�correctly intezpre�i�g §11Q3.Q2�D (Cul-de-sac Reductions} of the City C�de. <br />15 4.3 City staf f hac� been intarpreting the cod� as rneaning that a reduc#za� in t�e right-o� way <br />16 cul-de-sac di�rae�sions ca�ld be approved if a,,,, n� o�'the �hree cri�eria were rr�ei. Thc <br />1� judge's opiniqn, howev�r, was t�at all thxee of th� criteria tx�ust be �net in order to allow a <br />18 less-tlian-s�andard cul-de-sac. <br />19 S.0 <br />20 5.1 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />REVIEW OF E�STING CUL-DE-�ACS <br />Sta�� �as c€��pleted a brief i�ventoxy of existzng cul-de-saes in Roseville and has %und <br />that the interpreta�ion of coc�e (as described above) zs �ot uz�ique and has b�ezz ilac practicc <br />far over 40 y�ars. Follovving is a list oi cul-de-saes built with 80-foot diamet�rs: <br />Lvca�ion .e..a<e>..o.o..e .............Year Buii� <br />950 Lydia Avenue .................... � 96S <br />SOD Lavell Avenue ...................1967 <br />27 22I 1 Irene Street ......................198$ <br />2s 1650 County Raad C2 ..............1989 <br />29 1665 Millwood Avenue ...........1989 <br />3t� 161 S E�dridge Aver�ue .............1995 <br />31 1417 Rose P1ace .......................1996 <br />Locatian .......................Year B�uilt <br />Rasetowrz Co�rt .................I997 <br />3050 �andy �Iao�C ...............1999 <br />Farring�on Avenue .............1999 <br />Mapie Lane Co�,u-t .............. T 999 <br />Cohansey Cixcle .................2003 <br />Reservoir Woads Circle.....200& <br />32 5.2 Also, after rev�ewiz�g the relevant sectia� of t�ne code us'ing the j�zdge's interpretation of <br />33 t�e cod�, it follows that: any "alternate design" cul-de-sac wa�ld need to zxzeet ail three <br />34 criteria and any cui-de-sac less than SO �'eet in diameter wouId not be allawed at ali. T�e <br />35 £aXlpwing cul-de-sacs are s�allear t�an $0 feet in diameter (radi�s= 40 �eet} ar are an <br />35 alterr�ate design, all of whieh fail to meet Code sta.n�.ards under t�e j�dge's interpretation: <br />37 <br />Loeation Year BuiIt Desi n e Radaius <br />Alaz-neda Siareei 1989 eul-de�sac 25 ft. <br />Huron Street � 995 �a�rannerhead <br />La1ce Street 1995 cul-de-sac 28.5 ft. <br />�a�.d Ave�ue 1997 �amrnerhead <br />To Hill Cirele � 997 c��-de-sac 30.34 ft. <br />Churchill �treet 1998 cul-de-sac 32.$ �i. <br />rROroo� z c��-a�-$��S RcA �z�zo�r <br />Pa�e 2 of 4 � � <br />.�;, <br />