My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0212_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0212_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:37:15 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville City Council <br />DRA.�'I` Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 18 of 38 <br />1 holder reach an agreement on the date for the one-day suspension; that the <br />�� Police Chief be directed to hold discussions with the Green Mill for a date, <br />� while retaining her authority to choose the date; and that staff is directed to <br />r� make reimbursementof the $500 already paid by the Green Mill to charity, <br />� upon passage of any appeal time for the fmal decision being made by the <br />�� City Council at this meeting. <br />� <br />� <br />�� <br />1� <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Kough; Pust; Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Nays: None <br />11 10. Consider Re-Appointments to Planning Commission <br />f� Mayor Klausing reviewed the current policy (Resolution 10266) indicating a <br />]� two-tier process for reappointme�nt/a�pointment of Commissioners. <br />�� <br />�ti� Pust moved, Roe seconded, approval of the reappointmentof Commission- <br />1� ers Daniel Boerigter and Jim Doherty to serve respectively for three year <br />1`� terms through March 31,2010, pursuant to current policy regarding reap- <br />1� pointment of Commission members. <br />1� <br />�� Councilmember Kough spoke in opposition to the motion, noted his inclu- <br />2 � sion of one of the candidates in his four (4) individuals selected for vacan- <br />��� cies on the Planning Commission; his not being able to interview Mr. <br />�:� Boerigter and Mr. Doherty, as they filled unexpired terms originally; and his <br />�f� lac�. of support for voting for someone he had not had an opportunity to in- <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />terview. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that the current policy indicated a two-tiered <br />process. <br />�� Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion, opining that merits of the <br />�� process were lacking; and that the process blocked consideration of the pro- <br />�� cedure that should be in place and followed. <br />3� <br />3� <br />3� <br />3E� <br />;� � <br />�$ <br />3� <br />Councilmember Pust, in response to Councilmember Ihlan, expressed her <br />willingness to discuss policy further, following the vote for reappointmentas <br />indicated by current policy. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined such a discussion would be meaningless fol- <br />lowing the reappointment as indicated by the motion on the floor. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.