My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0212_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0212_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:37:15 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville City Council <br />DRA�` Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 19 of 38 <br />�� Councilmember Roe concurred with Councilmember Pust, that any future <br />� appointments would be proactive; and that only the reappointment of these <br />� two individuals on this particular commission was currently being consid- <br />�� ered. Councilmember Roe reiterated comments made previously that Coun- <br />�- cilmember's Kough and Ihlan had moved and voted the current policy; and <br />� questionedtheir lack of support for the policy at this time. Councilmember <br />�`- Roe opined that these were two excellent commissioners being considered <br />�� for reappointment; and further opined that they were both previously ap- <br />� pointed during Councilmember Kough's time in office, so he should have <br />1 o been a participant in their interviews. <br />t] <br />�� <br />i� <br />l4 <br />.1� <br />Councilmember Ihlan, in response to Councilmember Roe's comments, <br />opined that the previous vote on the policy was irrelevant and was the best <br />policy available under the circumstances. <br />T� Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the motion; and recognized Planning <br />1'� Commission Chair Bakeman's comments endorsing the reappointment of <br />1� both Commissioner Boerigter and Doherty; their work to-date and the future <br />1� workload of the commission and their expertise and skills already devel- <br />�� oped. <br />23 <br />� <br />�.3 <br />-�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />� <br />�.. <br />�: <br />��� <br />3� <br />..� <br />3� <br />:� 5 <br />�� <br />��� <br />� <br />��� <br />•10 <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br />Motion carried. <br />11. Consider Appointments to the Planning Commission <br />Considerable discussion was held regarding the process for voting on the <br />appointmentprocess; and the context of Chair Bakeman's endorsements. <br />Councilmembers Ihlan and Kough registered their opposition to including <br />Chair Bakeman's recommendations as part of the selection process. <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, to not include Planning Commission Chair's <br />recommendation in the City Council selection process. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned how the process would be skewed with in- <br />cluding Chair Bakeman's recommendationsin the process. <br />Further discussion ensued. <br />Roll Call <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.