Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville City Council <br />DRAFT Minutes of 1� 2� ��� Pg 2 3 of 38 <br />� Ga�y Bo�yczka, 2250 Aco�n Road <br />� Mr. Boryczka addressed the relocation of the existing home and garage; <br />� questioned how the homes would be situated and where their frontage would <br />� be in comparison to their side yard setbacks; his interpretation of City Code, <br />� Section ����.f?��'?�"�; opined that the road right-of-way was not correctly <br />� shown on the plat map, and was not wide enough; submission of two drain- <br />� age plans; and addressed stipulations from City code and his interpretations <br />� of stipulations. <br />1 �i <br />11 Ms. Bloom responded to Mr. Boryczka's interpretation of the roadway as <br />1� presented; and clarified City standards. City Attorney Anderson clarified <br />1:� that a Preliminary Plat was a concept or idea for splitting the lot under code <br />1� provisions to provide buildable lots; followed by the developer proceeding <br />1� with platting the land for Final Plat approval, including an approved storm <br />1�� water drainage plan; building of the roads to specifications prior to Final Plat <br />]} approval. Mr. Anderson discussed the need to move the house in order to <br />1� build the road, thus negating the proposal. Mr. Stark concurred, further de- <br />1� tailing the normal permittingprocess followed as the project develops. <br />�� <br />— � 1 Ms. Bloom noted that the storm sewer and road would be public, and the de- <br />� �� veloper would need to provide an easement or provide an option for on-site <br />�� storm water management, in accordance with a Public Improvement Con- <br />�� tract between the City and the Developer, at 100% the developer's cost; and <br />��� noted other feasible solutions for development of the project. <br />�Ei <br />�� Mr. Boryczka further discussed drainage and storm water pond management <br />��3 by the City, access, and liability; a current study of this area by the Univer- <br />��� sity of Minnesota on air quality and impacts to the land by redevelopment; <br />���� tree preservation; his rationale why the project shouldn't be built. <br />�I <br />�� Mr. Boryczka concluded by opining that the developer needed to present his <br />�� plans in detail at this time, not at the time of Final Plat approval; and opined <br />�4 that the entire project didn't make sense, and should not be at the proposed <br />�� density. Mr. Boryczka further alleged that a neighbor had been misled as to <br />3� the time of the meeting, anticipating that February 12, 2007, was the date <br />:�� originally scheduled. <br />3� <br />�� Geo�ge L�Te�d�°�, 2121 W County Road B <br />