My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0212_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0212_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:37:15 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />;� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />,� <br />�3 <br />�� <br />1Q <br />�i <br />1� <br />1:3 <br />1� <br />1:� <br />l �, <br />1� <br />t� <br />f� <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />2� <br />�� <br />�5 <br />��� <br />27 <br />22� <br />��? <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�2 <br />�� <br />�4 <br />�� <br />Roseville City Council <br />DRAFT Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 27 of 38 <br />eiaiion for the public comments heard on the issue and their concerns; origi- <br />nal concerns and objections expressed by neighbors and the City Council re- <br />garding the private cul-de-sac and lack of emergency and service vehicle ac- <br />cess and operations; and her reliance on the expertise of the City Engineer <br />regarding roadway width and right-of-way sufficiency. Councilmember <br />Pust reviewed the various balance issues required; City Council support of <br />mature tree preservation, and lack of current tree preservationpolicies; the <br />need for the-council to do their work in adopting a tree preservation ordi- <br />nance; and the need for the public to hold the City Council accountable for <br />enforcing conditions on subdivisions. <br />Mayor Klausing briefly interrupted to encourage residents to contact staff <br />with any areas of non-compliance with previously-approved subdivisions for <br />enforcement of applied conditions. <br />Councilmember Pust concluded by noting that, in Section 7.2 of the staff re- <br />port regarding previous subdivision of the surrounding properties; and noted <br />that some of those opposing the project were living on lots previously subdi- <br />vided; with past and future subdivision a part of the area and the commu- <br />nity's redevelopment and similar benefits applicable to Mr. �u�lle�- as well. <br />Councilmember Pust noted the willingness of Mr. Mue�ler to work with the <br />neighbors; thanked the public for their comments; and encouraged their sup- <br />port for Mr. Mucller'� willingness to take their concerns into consideration <br />in developing and revising the proposed development, taking into considera- <br />tion economic realities and his ownership of the property, and expressed her <br />support of the project if the current motion failed. <br />Councilmember Roe noted the difficulty in making this decision, and his <br />discussions with neighbors, as well as public comment at the Planning <br />Commission and City Council levels; and the frustration in not being able to <br />please everyone. Councilmember Roe opined that his biggest issue was City <br />acceptance of the cul-de-sac and justification for serving a�mal� number of <br />homes, noting that some concerns could be addressed through conditions, <br />and may prove beneficial to Acorn Road. <br />;��� Councilmember Roe opined that he couldn't share the safety objections, as <br />�� the Acorn Road volumes didn't support major safety issues and noted that <br />;�� there are other areas of the City that have much more dense intersections, <br />�� and that it didn't meet the thresholds of health and safety concerns as out- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.