Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />t <br />� <br />E� <br />� <br />� <br />�� <br />IO <br />l] <br />Rosevil�e City Council <br />DRAM' Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 29 of 38 <br />Discussion ensued regarding previous proposals; code requirements for <br />properties abutting a public road; city enforcement for public roads; and <br />emergency vehicle access. <br />Councilmembers Kough and Ihlan spoke in opposition to the amendment. <br />Roll Call [Amendment] <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough and Ihl�n. <br />Motion carried. <br />�� Roe moved an additional condition that for the City's acceptance of the pub- <br />1� lic cul-de-sac, that all four properties front the cul-de-sac. The motion failed <br />L� for lack of a second. <br />l� <br />l �� <br />1� <br />i� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />2� <br />24 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�f� <br />Roll Call [Original Motion] <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust and Klausing. <br />Ways: Kough and Ihliin. <br />Motion carried. <br />��� Consider Request by WCL Associates to Rezone 2216 County Road D <br />and to receive a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Class �I Restaurant <br />with Drive-Thru Facilities (�.'F07-001) <br />Community Development Director John Staxk presented the request of WCL <br />Associates for approval of rezoning the property at 2216 County Road D <br />from B-4 (Retail Office Service District) to B-3 (General Business District) <br />to make it consistent with Section 1015 of City Code; and for approval of a <br />Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a Class IF restaurant <br />(fast food convenience) to accommodate a drive-thru facility. <br />:�� Staff recommended approval, noting Planning Commissionerrecommenda- <br />:31 tion for approval on a 610 vote at their January meeting, and based on the <br />�� staff report dated January 29, 2007. <br />�� <br />34 Mr. Stark questioned the status of the 60-day approval period; which may be <br />�� moot depending on the outcome of the Council's decision. Mr. Stark de- <br />�� tailed conditions in Section 6 of the staff report. <br />�� <br />3� Discussion included implications of the 60-day approval period; with the <br />;�+� City Attorney not referencing the 60-day ruling and processing of the re- <br />r�� quest as outlined. <br />