2007_0326_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

�� SEH MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas Paschke, City of Roseville FROM: George Calebaugh, PE, PTOE DATE: February 22,2007 RE: Roseville, Minnesota Revised Franks Redevelopment Traffic Review SEH No. A-ROSEV0701.00 14.00 As requested, SEH completed a traffic review of the revised Franks Redevelopment at 1800 Highway 36 in Roseville. The revised Franks Redevelopment site plan (dated ll22107) and a traffic study (dated 11310'� by RLK for the revised redevelopment were reviewed. Comparing the revised Franks Redevelopment site plan to the original Franks Redevelopment site plan reviewed by SEH (see 5�l3' � Franks redevelopment traffic study dated December S, 2005), the following changes to the building uses and sizes were noted: ■ Tl�e bank is about 700 square feet larger in the revised plan. ■ The sporting goods store is the same size in both plans. ■ The general retail use is about 3,300 square feet less in the revised plan. ■ A 2,018 square foot drive-thru coffee shop is shown in the revised plan, but is not included in the original plan. Using our December 5,2005 traffic study information and the revised Franks Redevelopment site plan, we revised our trip generation and traffic analysis for the Franks redevelopment site. The revised trip generation for the site is shown in Table 1(see attachment). The weekday average daily traffic for the revised plan is 3,9ll vehicles per day, compared to 2,888 vehicles per day in the original study. The PM peak hour volume for the revised plan is 512 vehicles per hour, compared to 424 vehicles per hour in the original plan. The AM peak hour volume increased considerably over the original plan (ll 5 original versus 382 revised), but the critical hour for the design of improvements still is the PM peak hour volume. Our revised PM peak hour volumes for the Fairvi�w Avenuel�rantage RoadlGluek Lane intersection are shown in Table 2(see attachment), and our results of the traffic operations analysis for the PM peak hour at the Fairview Avene�elFrontage RoadlGluek Lane intersection are shown in Table 3(see attachment). The increase in site-generated traffic from the revised redevelopmentplan is relatively small and does not change our findings and conclusions from the original study. Comments Regarding R�,K's Traffic Study We have some disagreement with the details of the RLK traffic study regarding trip generation for the site and the traffic operations analysis results. However, we are in agreement with the findings and conclusions of the RLK traffic study. Short Elllott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 551 9 0-51 55 SEH is an equal opportunityemployer � www.sehlnc.com � 651.490,2[30D j 800.325.2055 � 65t.4S0,2�5bfax