My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0326_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0326_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:20:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />4 <br />� <br />�, <br />f <br />� <br />� <br />i� <br />�1 <br />1� <br />1� <br />14 <br />1� <br />1 �� <br />1� <br />78 <br />�1 � <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />2� <br />�6 <br />�� <br />City Council Study Session <br />Monday, March 19,2007 <br />Page 6 <br />would seem to be a more appropriate expenditure of reserves than day�to- <br />day operations. <br />Councilmember Roe concurred with Mayor Klausing's observations; both <br />from a cost and product outcome standpoint; noting that the environmental, <br />housing and storm water drainage portions should be adequate; and noted <br />the longevity of the Comprehensive Plan, along with incorporation of the <br />community visioning process and ability to amortize the costs over a number <br />of years. Councilmember Roe opined his support for staff returning to the <br />City Council with a recommendation on how to proceed with options for <br />technical updates and rewriting obsolete portions of the plan. <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of the Comprehensive Plan and pe- <br />riodic upgrades. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that all decisions, including what's obsolete <br />and needs to be updated are policy questions needing to be decided by a su- <br />per majority City Council vote, including policy questions as to what should <br />be spent and where such funding would come from. Councilmember Ihlan <br />opined that the first priority should be to meet the Metropolitan Council <br />deadlines and how best to accomplish that, and that an expenditure in the <br />line of $35,000 was a major consideration, but would be a more appropriate <br />commitment at this time. Councilmember Ihlan noted that the City Council <br />hadn't even had a chance to review and react to the visioning process and <br />that expenditure, and was now looking at another major expenditure for out- <br />side consultants. <br />��3 CouncilmemberIhlan favored Option 1; opining that some sections were too <br />�« focused on Master Plans, and required a serious policy discussion, in light of <br />;�o recent Twin Lakes development issues; and flexibilities in the Master Plans. <br />��] Councilmember Ihlan further opined that the focus should be on technical <br />;3� things that fill up the notebook for the Metropolitan Council; then have the <br />�� City Council launch a longer-term plan going through the visioning docu- <br />�� ment and give guidance to the Planning Commission on how to incorporate <br />�� those items into the Comprehensive Plan. Counciimember Ihlan further <br />�� opined that the City Council should discuss the use of consultant fees, <br />�7 through open and honest dialogue, and include in the annual budget and tax <br />�� for such needs. <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.