Laserfiche WebLink
Single-FamilyResidential Lot Split Study <br />■ The lots in this area are large, and the loss of privacy, the increased noise & increased traff'ic was uza.weteorne.'Those <br />lots are out of proportion to the rest of the neighbarhood. <br />■ Added traff'ic, trees removed, construction noise. 10 houses is too much. Housing market has changed. <br />■ Improvement to neighborhood. <br />■ Increase surrounding property values. <br />� Originally 16 townhomes were planned for this site, when neighbors banded together to oppose rezoning, approval <br />by the City Councilwas denied. (City staff supparted the rezoning and PUD plan, initially). That developer sold the <br />property and another developer was able to meet setback requirements and subdivide the lot to 4 siri��-�'am�ylots. <br />■ Because the City Councilvoted to keep the area zoned "single-family"instead of "medium density" (townhouses) to <br />override the Planning Commission action. <br />� I was supportive of the original plan to build four twin homes on the property, but not of the fmal decision to build <br />four large homes. They do not fit with the other homes in the neighbarhood. <br />� Originally they wanted to put town houses on the property. I was opposed! I am glad they put single-family homes <br />on the property. They turned out very nice. <br />■ Lovely homes came zr�to the area and helped our values. <br />� We were ea�tremely happy when single-family homes were built. We were not in favor of multiple housing. <br />� First they were going to build townhouses then they divided them into four single-family lots. I think four lots were <br />too many. <br />■ Want to support families with children. Single-family homes most likely to bringin families with children. Supportive <br />for single-family homes. Opposed to a�ts, condos, townhomes - do not fit into environment -�oc�l� of the street. <br />■ �'�C•l, t� not? <br />■ Because it was a big lot and can easily [be] subdivided to a single family home. <br />3. Have you noticed any ��«�� neighborhood impacts since the subdivision of this lot? <br />'�j�'4 ��S'x �Y'v �li� <br />If ves. what? <br />Indifferent. <br />Only ��o��z�z one source did I hear a��y posirive feedback - supposedly my property increased in value. �'�� let you a�z�ow <br />in 20+ years! This was E�om a realtor passingby. <br />Nice lookinghomes have improved lool� of neighborhood and values. <br />■ New house on County B is much more attractive than old one. <br />■ They have built two nice new homes. <br />■ Housing stock has improved! <br />Older house upgraded to newer high-value home. <br />' House looks better than the lot that was there. <br />Everyone says it looks like a park now and Mrs. Bucher really e�joyed ti-,t landscape till she moved. The property is <br />much improved, and very enjoyable to have. <br />■ Absolutely not! <br />■ One more family in neighborhood. <br />■ I hope they don't think they can split the lot next door. There is not the room. <br />■ These home%lots are so high priced, it will buoy my home value. I also expect these new homes will add a greater <br />property taY base than the current housing stock. <br />` Two older unimproved homes on Parker at the subdivision site were removed. <br />Visibility for the neighbarhood �n �i visibility that �osevi,I]e can be a place to grow with your family. <br />` Really too soon to evaluate impacts. Only one house complete. Ask again in 6 months. <br />• Definitely not! This development does not fit the neighbarhood. <br />� Ultimately may increase value of our home - but that is not clear yet <br />Ha�ne Ave. "looks" better. <br />Nice people in 3 of 4 homes, well kept properties. <br />� Four high-quality houses were built and sold immediately to c�uali�zed buyers. <br />:�� of the neighbors were happy that single dwelling homes were built on the property. <br />■ Our neighbors are very pleased to have single-family homes in such a busy traff'ic area. <br />February 24,2007 Draft -' ��� � <br />