My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0416_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0416_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:21:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Survey Results <br />Chatsworth Court (952, 960, and 9 78 ParkerAvenue) <br />Number of Survey Sent 58 <br />Number of Surveys Received: 18 <br />Response Rate: 31% <br />Single-Family Residential Lot Split Study <br />���i � <br />1, Did you live at your existing home when the single-family residential �ot(s} at 952.960. and 978 Parker <br />Avenue was (were) subdivided? <br />100% Yes ,_,,,,, 1� {} �3id not need to complete the remainder of the survey.) <br />2. Were you initially supportive, in opposition to, or indifferent to the subdivision of this lot? <br />11% Supportive 50% Opposed 39% Indifferent <br />Aesthetics <br />I met with the neighbor and his plans were upscale. Could only have a�osi�iv�/effect�ve outcome. <br />Diversi�/AfFordability of Housing <br />■ A very lovely wooded area was totally destroyed. Estate taxes wlll go up as they already ha�e. <br />F'annilies/Schoois <br />■ Bringing young �a�.�ies to the neighborhood is good. Continuing to improve the properties in �ZZ.oseville w�1.1 <br />contribute to growth and development for � city. <br />�it/Con�ext of Neighborhood <br />I�e�t that we didn't need that many homes on appro�mately 2 1/2 -3 acres. I felt that 2-3 homes would ha�e been ok. <br />Too many large homes built on a small tract of land. <br />The lots in this area are large, and the loss of privacy, the increased noise & increased traffic was unwelcome. Those <br />lots are out of proportion to the rest of the neighborhood. <br />Added traffic, trees removed, construction noise. 10 houses is too much. Housing market has changed. <br />Habitat/Upen Space/Trees � <br />Potentialimpacts on wildlife and runoff (stormwater and spring snow melt). <br />A very lovely wooded area was totally destroyed. Estate taxes wlll go up as they already ha�e. <br />■ Added traffic, trees removed, construction noise. 10 houses is too much. Housing market has changed. <br />Stormwater Rut�o�f/ Drainage <br />Potential impacts on wildlife and runoff (stormwater and s�ritz� snow melt). <br />■ Primary reason was inadequate �lan for handling clrainage/z�xn-af� due to raised grade of new development. <br />Txaf�c <br />■ The lots in this area are large, and the loss of privacy, the increased noise 8c increased traffic was unwelcome. Those <br />lots are out of proportion to the rest of the neighborhood. <br />■ Added traffic, trees removed, construction noise. 10 �ouses is too much. Housing market has changed. <br />Other <br />Ill-informed, suspected more of a townhome complex type deal, not single-family homes on cul-de-sac. <br />■ Periodically homes are built or z'emodeled on Parker Avenue. <br />■ Because I live the other side of Shryer Ave. <br />3. Have you noticed any � neighborhood impacts since the subdivision of this lot? <br />�"". s Yes 78% No <br />If ves. what? <br />4/6/2007 Draft :L +� � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.