Laserfiche WebLink
Comments <br />Sin�le-Familv Residential Lot SpNit Study Open House <br />What should single-family development look like? <br />■ Owasso Hills! ! <br />Nice cul-de-sac. A real shortage of ��J� ��•��:��'�� &upper bracket townhomes 500-700K_ <br />Sma111ots, front porches, sidewall�s —like Falcon Heights. Let's get into the 21" century <br />w/our new construction! <br />Around open space with i�reg�lar streets. <br />What physical impact are you most: concerned with from new single-familyhomes? <br />Water &vegetation issues. The seemingly slow process & the Tr�indset of long time <br />�osevi�� residents that we are out in the country. We are not. We are a 1 Sr sing suburb and <br />not allowing good single family homes will doom this city to be a renter's haven. <br />■ City not moving fast �nrk4���s. <br />■ Loss of green space. <br />What is the minimum number of lots a new public street should serve? <br />That is not a fair question, depends �1� neighborhood. <br />How should Roseville accommodate new residential growth? <br />■ The ambience of Roseville is spoiled by putting 2 houses on a single lot. The building plans <br />are not compatible — lool� at Acorn Rd. As we remove green space and every split does, we <br />take the livability out of our city. Please provide the physical attractiveness of our city — we <br />are unique. Northwestern College has been allowed to t��� two lal�es — stop them now!!! <br />The city needs to keep the school system alive, as that affects properiy values as much if not <br />more than anything else. The best thing that has happened in a long time is Ourasso Hills <br />where homes can support larger families. That brings up the affordability issue. If you <br />decrease the lot sizes you can hold down costs and still put up a quality 2 story. Attracting <br />young families is key. <br />By becoming a little more open-minded. <br />Carefully with much resident input i�+�k with lot splits. People who have platted subdivisions <br />should be able to rely on current density — not neighborhood greed potential on the requests <br />of Met Council. <br />Comments <br />■ This is a good idea, but not approving development is not to grow & flourish. Our city will <br />die on the vine without more homes to keep the people (families)in our school district— <br />many people ha�e to buy in Shoreview— SAD commentary. <br />No lot sp�.ts. Need new housing? Work with space a�ailable— new housing techniques -- <br />build communities. <br />Single-Family Lot Split Op� House: Ma�h 15, 2006 � o� � <br />