Laserfiche WebLink
March 22 Meeting Summary (Revised) <br />Single-FamilyResidential Lot Split Advisory Group <br />MEETING ATTENDEES <br />A,dvi�sorv Committee Members <br />Dan J3oe�.-igter <br />Jim Doherty <br />Gary Grefenbexg <br />Darrel LeBarron <br />Vivian �2arz�alingam <br />Joe Wozniak <br />SURVEY SUMMARY <br />Citv Council <br />Ta�y Pust <br />Committee�City Staff <br />Aimee Gourlay <br />John Stark <br />Jamie Radel <br />Jamie presented a brief s�mmary of the results from the lot split surveys that were sent out in <br />early March. The Community Development Department sent surveys to neighbors within 350 <br />feet of four recently split lots. One-hundred ninety-seven surveys were sent and 64 were <br />received, for a response rate of 32 percent. She explained that she was very happy with the <br />response rate as the survey only provided approximately five days to for recipients to complete <br />and return it to the City. <br />Recurrent themes in the survey results were those of concern over open space, trees, and <br />wildlife; ability to bring new families to Roseville; favoring new single-family homes to new <br />multifamily homes; and property values. Advisory Committee members requested that staff <br />group the comments on the surveys by topic (e.g. traffic, stormwater, open space, etc.), which <br />will be provided at the next meeting. <br />There was significant discussion during the survey results discussion by Advisory Group <br />members regarding elements �h�y believe are important to address during the Lot Split Study, <br />including, but not limited to: economic impact of lot splits for the City, house design, and <br />aesthetic impacts. <br />PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE <br />Jamie presented a brief report on the March 15 Open House. Approximately 25 people signed in <br />to the event; staff estimated that there were approximately 3 5 people over the course of the <br />evening. The event offered a number of inethods for participants to provide their inp�t— <br />interactive questions, a lot design activity, and a comment sheet. <br />Questions <br />What �h�sical im�act are �ou most concerned with from new sin�le-familv homes? <br />Results: Increased traffic, 3 votes; tree removal, 3 votes; stormwater management, 9 votes; and <br />decreased open space, l l votes. <br />What is the minimum number of lots that should be served by a new public road? <br />Results: 1-5,0 votes; 16-20,0 votes; 6-10, 1 vote; and l�-15, 6 votes <br />March 22 Meeting .Su�sa�aary Pc�gre � of 3 <br />