Laserfiche WebLink
How should Roseville accommodate new household rg owth? <br />Results: Multi-family housing only, 0 votes; single-family housing only, 4 votes; and a mixture <br />of multi- and single-family housing, 20 votes <br />Lot Design Activity <br />What we learned from this activity <br />Difficult to make general conclusions <br />Conte�t is important <br />� Density should not be assumed to be bad <br />■ Private roads can he acceptable <br />Current grid zoning does not address the preferences indicated in the exercise <br />(Attached are the results of this activity.) <br />Comment Sheets <br />A summary sheet listing the comments provided by community members who attended the open <br />house was handed out to Advisory Group members. Some people added comments responding to <br />the three questions listed above. <br />DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR LOT SPLIT POLICY <br />Aimee Gourlay led the Advisory Group in beginning to narrow down potential alternatives in <br />answering the questions put forward by the City Council. Items discussed included: lot <br />dimensions, code uniformity, lot shape, other standards (e.g. tree preservation, open space <br />preservation, etc.), public streets, variable densities, and housing affordability/k�ousing stock <br />diversity. The following summarizes the issues for further discussion put forward by the group. <br />Lot Dimensions <br />House siting options <br />Smaller required lot size <br />Cluster homes <br />Communitv-Wide �nifvrmi�v <br />■ Non-uniform <br />Shape <br />� Gerrymandering lot boundaries to <br />meet minimums <br />Other S�andaxdsl(�xd��:az�ces <br />Stormwater <br />■ Neighborhood character <br />Environmental impact <br />Tree preservation (some people left <br />prior to this suggestion) <br />�Zequired Public Streets <br />Eliminated from future discussion <br />Decreasing Densitv in One Area to Increase <br />Densitv in Another <br />■ Eliminated from future discussion <br />Housing Affordabilitv/Housin� Stock <br />Diversi <br />City cannot regulate this under the <br />current single-family standards <br />Other Policies <br />Coverage ratios <br />Lot recarnbiz�atian <br />March 22 Meeiing S'ummary Pc�gre ? of 3 <br />