Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />S <br />� <br />�' <br />� <br />�� <br />1(� <br />17 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />DRAFT Minutes of Monday, Apri109,2007 <br />Page 10 <br />for the City Council to utilize when meeting with individual organiza- <br />tions, civic or school bodies. <br />Councilme�nber Pust further opined that while recognizing the need <br />for staffs 90-day review timeframe, she preferred that items requiring <br />less detailed analysis or having less fiscal impact, would be brought to <br />the City Council before that allotted time, rather than waiting for the <br />entire package to be presented; thus allowing more immediate City <br />Council follow-up and citizen awareness that the process was ongo- <br />ing. <br />x�� Councihnember Roe opined that it made sense �`or the City Council to <br />�� get their hands around sections, and have ongoing discussions, as well <br />1� as more detailed discussions on certain areas after the 90-day time- <br />�� frame; it was also imperative to get the Advisory Commissions in- <br />1r; volved in the process immediately. <br />�� <br />�� <br />1� <br />— �� <br />�1 <br />2� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�f <br />28 <br />29 <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the value of waiting for the entire <br />90-days for a systematic approach, or reviewing items in smaller <br />pieces; and the need to keep citizens involved in the implementation <br />process. <br />Councilmember Ihlan was amenable to the 90-day approach; however <br />noted that individual Councilmembers may have their own goals and <br />priorities as the 2008 Budget process approached, and may need to do <br />their own goal setting and priorities individually, while staff is doing <br />their review; to allow all entities to be ready to discuss policy direc- <br />tions the public advocated for implementation. <br />�� Councilmember Pust opined that, with the visioning process repre- <br />�� senting such an important investment of citizen time and resources, <br />�� perhaps a standing item should be included on each Council agenda <br />�ti� for ongoing updates and as another way to keep the item before citi- <br />�� zens and hold the City Council accountable for moving goals forward. <br />�� Further discussion included periodic review of the City Council and <br />�� staff of broad goals and objectives to a11ow staff to identify particular <br />�� steps and areas of interest, while recognizing changing technologies; <br />�� how to provide staff of individual and corporate Councilmember fo- <br />�3� cus of the visioning with other City Council priorities and projects; <br />