Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />7 <br />S <br />� <br />1� <br />City Council Study Session <br />Monday, Aprii 16,2007 <br />Page 9 <br />Further discussion included flashing frequency of electronic signage; <br />scrolling signs; intensity of displays; definition of institutional uses <br />and referencing it in the definition section; staff interpretation, appli- <br />cation and enforcement inconsistencies over the years; light bulb <br />strings and differentiating residential andlor commercial uses; tempo- <br />rary signs and their regulation versus banners and rationale for their <br />prohibition, related maintenance and enforcement issues; and whether <br />increased flexibility was warranted for temporary signage such as <br />banners. <br />1� City Manager IVialinen provided comment at the request of Council- <br />1� member Kough regarding his support for banners on a temporary ba- <br />t:� sis for special events. <br />l4 <br />k� Staff was directed to resubmit the revised Roseville Sign Regulation <br />1� ordinance to the City Council at their May meeting; following addi- <br />f� tional direction and comment from tonight's meeting, and �urther re- <br />�� view by staff and the City Attorney. Mayor Klaus�n� asked that the <br />1� newly-revised document be provided to the City Council prior to their <br />�t� meeting to allow additional and substantial review time prior to dis- <br />�Z <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�,� <br />�� <br />�7 <br />�� <br />�� <br />3�} <br />�� <br />�� <br />;� � <br />�� <br />�� <br />�6 <br />�'� <br />3�3 <br />cussion. <br />c. Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Staffing — Discussion <br />of �IRA Staffing and Direction for the Future <br />Community Development Director John Stark summarized the staff <br />report dated April 16, 2007 regarding staffing of the Housing and Re- <br />development Authority (HRA) and utilization and/or impacts to the <br />Community Development staff. Mr. Stark noted that the HRA, at <br />their March 30, 2007 meeting, chose an alternative staffing proposal <br />to: name the Community Development Director as its Executive Di- <br />rector; seek creation of a part-time (20 hourslweek) Housing Coordi- <br />nator position; and utilize a portion (8 hourslweek) of the Community <br />Development Senior Office Assistant's time. Mr. Stark reviewed the <br />T�'s purpose of the proposed changes to maintain better integration <br />between City and HRA activities by having common staff; and to <br />more efficiently operate the �RA by having more staff hours dedi- <br />cated to its staffing within their existing budget. <br />