Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />City Council Study Session <br />Monday, April 16,2007 <br />Page 8 <br />Mayor Klausing thanked staff and the study group representatives for <br />their work and expressed anticipation of the completed report in May. <br />� By Councilmember consensus, staff was directed to complete their <br />� study and present their fizll recommendations to the City Council in <br />� mid-May (May 14, 2007 Council Study Session), after the expiration <br />8 of the moratorium on Apri123, 2007; and allowing an additional pres- <br />� entation to the City's Planning Commission for their input prior to <br />1� presenting recommendations to the City Council . <br />�] <br />12 <br />1� <br />14 <br />15 <br />1� <br />17 <br />1� <br />� i� <br />�o <br />�1 <br />2� <br />b. Sign Regulations — Review and Discussion of Modifications to <br />Roseville Sign Regulations <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke presented the most recent version of the <br />Sign Regulation ordinance amendment, as reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission and City Attorney, following its most recent revisions, <br />and a total of six Public Hearings heard at the Planning Commission <br />level. Mr. Paschke recognized those members of the Planning Com- <br />mission — current and present — for their extensive work on refining <br />the document (Planning Commissioners Mary Bakeman, Dan Bo�rig- <br />ter and former CommissionerTammy Pust). <br />�� Mr. Paschke opined that the proposed document, as amended, was <br />�4 well-designed and will allow for future growth in the City's sign area <br />�� and create a staff review process responsive to changes in the sign in- <br />�� dustry and technologically, and review and approval of specific sign-. <br />�� age throughout the City utilizing the Development Review Committee <br />�� (DRC) and a Master Sign Plan procedure. <br />�� <br />�o Considerable discussion ensued regarding definitions of and types of <br />31 flashing or electronic signs; addition of City Attorney recommenda- <br />�� tions (z.e., severability clause); and various sections revised to avoid <br />�� contradictory language; the impact of including illustrations within the <br />�4 language, with the inclusion of language regarding diagrams for illus- <br />;35 trative purposes only, with text controlling the ordinance; and rational <br />3� for prohibiting scrolling, rotating andlor changing images and their <br />:� 7 distraction potential. <br />�� <br />