2007_0507_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

[ recon�gured parcels n�ust be recorded at Ran�s�y County within b0 days of the date of the approvaI. Recently, in preparatio�l for selling the 19Q7 Gluek La��e property, Mr. Peterson realized that ti�e recoz��gur�d parcels were never recorded at Ramsey Caunty; the reasons -T far this are discussed in the attached letter. Mr. Petersnn now requests thafi the City Council reaffir�ns its approval ot�the recon�bination (t�e relevant survey is also attached) �} so that he may recorcE t�ae revised l�ga1 desc�-iptions and execute the sale of his property. 5.0 STAFF COMMENTS � 5. I Mr. Peterson has ii�dicated that he was waiting for written caniir�natian of the July 24, f� 2006 approval before req�esting that the ��aal docurnentation be prepared. The � t� recombination approval occurr�d during a time of significant staffing changes in the ':. � Communi�y Develop�nEnt Department, however, so it is likely ihat he never received s�ch '? written confirmation. Further, since the applieant was in atte�dat�ce for the Council's �� review and approva� of the lot line r�coinbination, staff believed that drafting a �= conf rmation letter would have been superfluous. In any case, nei#her Mr. Peterson's �� records nor those of the Community Developm�nt Departzne�at cantain �vidence of 1 f; written can�rmatio�� of the ap�ravai. 1? 5.2 1� prelimir�ary s�zrvey af tl�e appr�ved pr�perry lir�e adjustm�en� was prepared saon after �� the apprroval date, but a final version has not yet been developed; a fnal Certi�cate af 1<� Survey must bc signed anci sealed by City officials in order to be accepted by the Ramsey 2t� County Recorder. z E 5.3 Because the recambination has already b�en approved, Mr. Peterson is essentially 2� requesting that the Council reaffirm its decision and allnw an extension of the time in �� which to record the details of the approved lot line correction. W � 6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 2� 6. i Based in the comments in sectinns 4 and 5 of this areport, ihe Planning Division ?E: recommends approval of the requested REAFFIRMATION OF T�IE LOT LINE �'7 RECOMSiNATION APPROVAL for the properties at 1903 and 1907 Gluek Lane. �'S 7.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACT�QN �t� 7.1 PASS A MOTION reaffirming the 2f��6 appraval of the LOT LINE RECOMBINATION �t� at 1903 and 1907 Gluek Lane, based on th� comments of Section 5 and recommendation �� t of Section 6 of t�e project report dat�d May 7, 2007, enabling the revised survey a�d _� � legal descriptions to be recarded at Ratnsey County. Prepared by: Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd (b51-792-7073} Attach�nents: A: Area �nap B: Applicant narrative C: Proposed survey D: Minutes from 07/24/2Q06 City Council �neeting PF3774_RC�_05070� Page 2 of 2