Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />4� <br />4 <br />,� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />1 �l <br />1� <br />1� <br />l� <br />1� <br />1� <br />1 �} <br />77 <br />1� <br />1 �? <br />�� <br />21 <br />I�r7 <br />L� L <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />� �} <br />�� <br />�� <br />��7 <br />��� <br />31 <br />��� <br />3� <br />3•1 <br />�� <br />�E� <br />:�7 <br />�3+� <br />�<a <br />�� <br />Regular City Council Meeting — DRAFT Minutes <br />Monday, April 23,2007 <br />Page 13 <br />Steve Gallop, 435 Walnut Lane <br />Mr. Gallop noted that, up until approximately 10 years ago, the annual <br />application was a Consent Agenda item, but at that time it became a <br />Public Hearing item. Mr. Gallop noted that the Ramsey County Sher- <br />iff was the governing body, and simply sought comment and input <br />from the Cities of Roseville and Shoreview prior to their issuance of <br />the annual permit to the Lake Owasso Safe Boating Association. Mr. <br />Gallop advised that the City of Shoreview consistently approved the <br />application by Consent Agenda, and had advised the Association that, <br />unless they heard otherwise, to assume their application was ap- <br />proved. <br />Councilmember Pust sought information as to the actual use of the ski <br />jump. <br />Mr. Gallop responded that usage was determined by the weather, con- <br />gestive boat traffic on the lake itself, and interest from other parties <br />residing as lakeshore residents, or accessing Lake Owasso from off <br />Slte. <br />Councilmember Pust asked the accuracy of people stating that the ski <br />jump "was never used" and further inquired how individuals seek <br />permission to use the jump. <br />Mr. Gallop opined that this would be inaccurate depending on the <br />above-referenced considerations, conditions, and inquiries to the Sher- <br />iff s Office or the Safe Boating Association via word-of-mouthfor use <br />from those not residing at the lake, but having sufficient safety <br />equipment to utilize the jump. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned why the current location had been <br />chosen for the ski jump. <br />Mr. Gallop advised that there was less wind at that site, that it covered <br />a large rock pile in the lake, and that fonner residents living adjacent <br />to that location had been jumpers and had no objection to sighting the <br />jump there. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned whether the Association would be <br />amenable to moving the ski jump to a different location. <br />