Laserfiche WebLink
.� <br />� <br />� <br />y� <br />� <br />t <br />_ � <br />i5 <br />l[} <br />l] <br />�� <br />I� <br />I� <br />1� <br />1� <br />1 '� <br />Regular City Council Meeting — DRAFT Minutes <br />Monday, Apri123,2007 <br />Page 32 <br />Council consensus was to adhere consistently to policy in not relying <br />on reserves for annual budget expenses. <br />City Manager Ma�inen clarified that this policy, by his interpretation <br />and application, would direct staff to do an analysis and projection of <br />revenue, with the understanding that they had to work within revenue <br />projections. Mr. M�Iinen emphasized that this would drive proposed <br />expenditures, and dictate what staff initially presented to the City <br />Council as the City Manager's recommended budget for 2008; ob- <br />serving that the recommended budget would be balanced in accor- <br />dance with that policy, whatever implications may be created. <br />Mayor Klausing observed that corrective action may not be able to be <br />taken in one fell swoop; but consistent with City policy, funding <br />mechanisms should be returned to replace all capital assets in an or- <br />derly way. <br />1� Councilmember Roe questioned if it was the intent to include re- <br />1� placement of City Hall buildings, or more for ongoing major mainte- <br />��� nance (i.e., roof replacement, HVAC replacement, etc.). <br />�1 <br />��� Mr. Miller advised that this policy looked at all assets, including City <br />�;� buildings; however, he suggested that the City Council look at it for <br />�4 an all-inclusive basis for infrastructure needs (i.e., water, street, build- <br />�� ings) to the extent funding was evident and providing a comfort level <br />�� for Councilmembers. <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />:� 1 <br />�� <br />�:� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />3� <br />�cs <br />Councilmember Roe suggested that there may be policy reasons not to <br />consider replacement of buildings (i.e., City Hall) in sinking funds, <br />and approach voters for a bond referendum, on a case by case basis, <br />for their direction, rather then collecting taxpayer money for a number <br />of years prior to such expenditure. Councilmember Roe asked, and <br />Councilmembers concurred, that staff provide rationale for each op- <br />tion to allow the Council to make a detenx�.i�.ation on the appropriate <br />level of funding. <br />Additional discussion included complementing policies for the Capital <br />Improvement Plan (CIP) policy and the operating budget. <br />� <br />� <br />