Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />� <br />3 <br />4 <br />rJ <br />6 <br />% <br />S <br />9 <br />io <br />11 <br />�.2 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />1. 8 <br />I9 <br />20 <br />2� <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />�6 <br />2'i <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />�� <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />4D <br />4 J, <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />�6 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />P�annia�g Com�nission M�eiing <br />Minutes — Vlledne�day, May 02, 2fl07 <br />Page 90 <br />to find a solution for a more viable and less-disruptive ingress/egress and <br />on-site route thraugh the Calvary Church property; <br />� Temporary signage will include signs places a� the 8urke exr"i� at Calvary <br />�.`�1lll'C%T Il1CflCt3�Il)Q', "no right turn,,, ar "1TQ A[l�'r�%re <br />Ayes; 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Matioe� carried. <br />Chair Bakeman clarified ihat residents needed to voice any vioiation concerns �o staff <br />in order for tt�em io enforce cor�ditions on the site, <br />Chair Bakernan �haniced r�sidents for their att�r�d�nce, interest and cvmrr�ents. <br />Mr. Paschke ad�ised ihat Cas� PF47-017 was scheduled for City Cour�cil <br />consideratian and actian ai their Mary 21, 2�Q7 regular meeting; and khat staff w�o�ld <br />make rr�ndificatians to amended cpnditior�s as outlined by the Plannir�g Corr�rriissian <br />prior to pr�sentatian of the case fio the Cifiy Council. <br />Sign Ordinance Sfatus <br />At the request af Chair Bakemar�, Mr. Paschke advised Commissiansrs that staff had received minima[ <br />questians or cancerns related ta ti�e sign ordinance revisions being advacated, and Gomments <br />appeared suppartive ofi the work accomplished to-date. Mr. Paschk� nated that sfiaff was cornpleting <br />sligl�t modifications to text for consistency, inserting numerous i[lustraiions, and oiher streamlining; <br />and anticipated presenting i�e ordinance �o the City Council at their May 21, 2007 regular rneetir�g. <br />b. PLANI�ING FILi� 3692 <br />Continuation of th� Rase�iile Cornprehensiv� Pla� iJpdat� Process �- Review of <br />��chnical update scf�edule wiih �arious City Commissior�s <br />Chair Bakeman apened the Public Hearing finr PEanning File 3692. <br />Cor�muni�y Dev�(opmen� �irector John Stark updated Commissianers on �he process <br />since the March rr�eeting, with 5ta#f preseniatio�s to and discussion a� t1�e City Council <br />a� the March and April Study Sessions; and subsequent City Council consensus for <br />s�affi to distr9bute �tequests fior Q�alifiicafiions (RFQ's} to planning consultant �irt�s. Mr. <br />Sfiark advised that siaff hac! sent o�t iwenty-eight (28} RFQ's, with a due daie of May <br />� 8, 2D�7; with anticipated staff selection af four (4) firms for City Council consideratinn <br />frorr� whom to request proposals. <br />Commissioner Boerigter soug�t elarificatian, related to a"hybrid" plan as advacaied <br />by sta�, of the actual scope of the update, and hcsw consultants would speak io their <br />in#erest and/or fees without knowing what the City was actually requesting. <br />Mr. Stark ad�ised t�at the process itse{f wouEd hefp define the scope, as the expertise <br />and observatiarts of the consultanis on the City's curreni Comprehensive Plari would <br />be utifized tn prnvide which sectinns remain viable, ar will need extensiue wark. <br />Additional diseussior� includecf actuaf cost projections for the �pdate (from $60,D(30 - <br />$200,000); perceived direcfiion frorr� the City Council on their fi�nding commitrnent to <br />the €�pdate; conversatior�s and oi�senratians of the City's Meirapoli#an Council <br />reprasentative, Ms. Torrie DuPres; and COt1G�E'31S reg�rding the time frarne fnr <br />cnmpleting ihe �pdate by the aniicipated deadline af December 31, 20�8. <br />