My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0611_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0611_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:26:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />F� <br />at <br />DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 21,2007 <br />Page 23 <br />On an unrelated note, Parks & Recreation Director Lonnie Broklze <br />noted Rosefest Buttons were available for sale at $2.00 each. <br />� Mr. Brokke reviewed in detail the staff report dated May 21,2007 and <br />� receipt of five Requests for Proposals (RFP's} from those eight firms <br />� originally contacted. Mr. Brokke provided background information; <br />� and emphasized that the study would be conceptual only, and not ac- <br />� tual design work, and was anticipated to take approximately two <br />� months to complete. <br />� c� <br />11 <br />�� <br />l :3 <br />�� <br />15 <br />16 <br />1 '� <br />1� <br />1� <br />� [� <br />�l <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />2� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />:�o <br />�� <br />�� <br />3� <br />34 <br />�;� <br />3� <br />�� <br />�� <br />Discussion included additional costs for soil borings andlor test holes; <br />concerns and explanations related to the large dollar disparity of the <br />proposals; expertise and references of the firms; new construction ver- <br />sus retrofit experience of the firms; additional discussions on wind <br />turbine systems; and the amount of time spent by staff interviewing <br />the five firm s . <br />Councilmember Pust thanked Councilmember Kough for his leader- <br />ship in bringing this energy technology forward for potential energy <br />efficiencies; and thanked Mr. Brokke for doing the preparatory re- <br />search and investigation�. <br />Kough moved, Pust seconded, to authorize an agreement between the <br />City and Geo-Xergy to conduct a feasibility study as outlined in the <br />attached proposal, in an amount not to exceed $14,300, to be funded <br />by the City Building ReplacementFund. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Kough; Ihlan; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />e. Request Direction �- Request Direction on the Process for Public <br />Input and Formal Acceptance of the Single-Family Residential <br />Lot Split Study Report <br />Discussion was held regarding the best practice to solicit additional <br />public input and comment on the report prior to formal City Council <br />action and consideration of policy implementation and/or revisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.