2007_0618_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Request �or Council Actian DATE: O&/18/2007 ITEM NO: �O.e Departam.ent Appxaval: �S Ci�y Mar�ager A}�pro al: '° Agenda �ection: I A 7�'�1..��.��.. �terri Description: Foaram�al�y Receive the Single-Fam�ly Residential Lat Spiit Stndy Final Re ort x.0 2 1.0 3 4 � z.o RE(�UESTED ACTION: Formally receive �he Single-Family Lot Split Acivisary Gra��'s May 14, 200'7, Single- Farnily Residential Lot Split Study Final Repar�. BACKGROUND: 6 2.1 On January 8, 2007, the Rose�ille City Council adopted an interirn ordinance i�pasing a 90- 7 day �aoratorium on residential Iot splits in order io undertake a study af t�e regulations 8 governing suc� lot spIits in the City of Roseville. T�e zzaarata�urr� too�C effect on �anuary 30, 9 2007. 10 2.2 Tn order to caz�aplets tk�e study, ihe City Cauncil createc� the Citizens Advisory Gxoup 11 (CAG), vvl�ich was comprised af t�ie Pla�ni�g Coz�a�issia� a.r�d faur members at large. The 12 Council solicited appIicaiion� for �he at-large members in February, and appainted them on 13 February 26. 1� 2.3 The CAG held a kickoff znee�i�g Qn March 6 and me� weekly from March 22 through April 15 26 (a to�al n�" seven meetings) to diseuss iss�es surrounding single-farnily lot splits. During 1b these meetings, zxaezz�iaer� xevzewed infarmation �athered fro� the nei�hborhood survey a�nd 17 open house, analyzed exis�in� citywide �engraphic daia, and developed a series of I S recommendati€�ns. The p�blic was invited to ai:t�nd az�d paz-ticipate in all o�'these meetings. 19 2.4 Public participation in the process was im�artant ta t�e CAG, As such, th� CAG posted a 20 project webpage, zampleme�ted a neighbarhoad s�,irvey in four areas where single-faarz�zly Xat 21 splits had recently �aken place, hasted a community open �ouse, parc�vided a pxogress repor� 22 at a Ci�y Council Study Session, and held a�ublic nneeting to discuss ih� group's draft 23 recommendations. 24 2.5 On May 1.4, 2QQ7, the CAG �resented its final repori and recomm�nciatzans to the Ci�y 25 Cauncil. At t�is meeting, rnernbers presented t�e siudy process ar�d data analyzed in 26 deve3aping the final recomzx�endatians. Ci�y Cauncii members asked questinns to fhe CAG 2"7 rnembers, but public caz�en� on the report and recammer�datinns was not heard at tl�is 28 meeting. (A copy af �he report was provided to t�e Ci�y Counc'rl prior ta the May 14 29 meeting, and therefo;re, has nat been included with t�is report.} .( of .2 061807 Lot Split Study