My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0618_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0618_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:26:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />].0 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />l.6 <br />1'7 <br />�S <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />3� <br />32 <br />33 <br />pfovide th� information necessary to consider ihe application, with the applicar�t <br />having mnre nf a char�ce to get a straight-forward appro�af. <br />7he app[icar�t expressed that this was t�eir frustration in what sta� was requiring for a <br />prelirninary site plan at this stage; and his being prepared �o pravide fiut�re <br />conr�ections; however, noting tha# typically someihing is not sehemed out at this level <br />of the applica�ion process. <br />Continuing disc�ssior� included the deadfine for tf�e review process; scope of the <br />project; s#aff's lacic of review of the site plan modifications prnvided earlier today by <br />the applicant; the high visibiiity and strategic nature nf this property tn the nrreraif <br />development of #he Twir� Lakes area; road right-of-way ownersttip, afficial mapping, <br />recarding, and future acquisi�ion for road+nr�y canstruction and right-af-way. <br />Staff reviewed their adhere�ce to the applicatian process and review period and their <br />ratianale far requestittg mare info�matian; inherent design guidelines; and lirr�ited <br />ability to require deviation from a cancept plan once passed anta the City Council fnr <br />iheir review, and major changes requiring amendment ta t1�e concept plan. <br />moTioN <br />M�mber poE�e�ty mov�d, seconded by Member Wozniak to REGOMMEtVD <br />DEI�tAL c�f the request by Cent Ventures artd Arr�West Development LLC, based <br />on the absence of periinent infarrnatian neces�ary as identified in Sectian 8.2 of <br />th� s#aff report dat�d J�r�� 6, 2p07. <br />Ayes: ,a <br />Nays: 2 (Boeri�ter, Gasongo) <br />Mo#ion to DENY carried. <br />Chair Bakernan ad�ised that the application would go befare the City Gouncil for <br />consideration at their June 18, 2p07 regular meeking, unless the appiicant submitted a <br />written extension to sfiaff.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.