Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />�7 <br />Reguiar C�ty Council Meeting <br />Mo�nday, .iune 11, 2007 <br />Pa�e 29 <br />Discussion included the examp�e of the Ga�tier property and th� entire <br />process; how to �xpedite the pxocess �or satisfact�on of affected <br />neighbars; and sta�'�' clarifca�ion o� and explanation to the City CaunT <br />cil at a future meeting of �h.e process. <br />Mr. Maschka noted that the C��y received goad compiiance fi•om the <br />majority of property owners, and that only a�ew were non-com�lying; <br />however, he noted the fius�-ations of neighbors when due proccss was <br />not a month-to-month process, but drug on over multiple xnonth <br />and/or yeaxs. M�. Maschka noted that �he r�commendations for me- <br />diation, eminent domain, abatement or couri ci�a�ions were simpTy <br />toots availa�le to encou�-age com�liance and reduce sign��ca.rit a�d of <br />ten d�t�imental impacts to neighborhoods (i.e., prop�z�y values, qua�- <br />ity of life, and safety impacts), and could be delegated by �he Council <br />to the HRA andlor staff. <br />18 Council�nember Roe suggested ihat discussion be scheduled at �he <br />19 Ju�y Worksession, if possib�e, along with s�a�'�' recommendations, to <br />20 provide an im�nediate response to HRA. recomrnendation #2, and the <br />2 �. possible adm�nis�rative �icket process. <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />2'7 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />Councilmember Ih�an questioned i�' �his was simply the issue of �he <br />City Council's euz�ent ro�e of enfo�rcer, or if it was a broader process <br />quest�on ne�daing a review of �he whale eode �n�orcement process, in- <br />cluding mediation, �manent domain, etc. <br />Councilmembe� Pus� requested �dditional in�`ozmation frorn sta�fprior <br />to upcoming discussions: averag� tim�line in terms of residential and <br />commercial properties to determine t�ends in different camplianc� <br />factors; and staf�'s interpreta�ion on what those factors are ihat deter- <br />mine upfront i� a specific property is going to non-compliani. <br />34 Mayor Klausing sought addx�ional s�aff input at the July Worksession <br />35 on how to pravide remedies; impacts to p�operty values, and their <br />36 rnonitoring and observations on the Galtier code enforcement process <br />37 �o-date. <br />38 <br />