Laserfiche WebLink
Reg�lar C�ty Cnu�eil Meetfng <br />Monday, June � �, 2007 <br />Page 32 <br />1 Mr. Sta�k noted the an�ieipat�d chain of command with the employee <br />. 2 reporting to Mr. Stark, Mx. Stark repariing to City Manager Maiinen, <br />3 and the City's Hurnan Resource process available to support that <br />4 chain of command. <br />5 <br />5 Klausing moved, Pust seconded, approva� oi creating one pa.rt-time <br />7 Housing Program Coordinato�r posztion w�ihin th� Community Devel- <br />S opmen� Department with a position gradc of 1 l; aild authorizing staff <br />9 to serve as th� Adminis�rative and Fiscal Agent for employing th�s po- <br />10 sition and ur�dertaking the necessaary budgetary revisions, so long as <br />11 those revisions are funded by the Roseville HRA.. <br />12 <br />13 Roll Cali <br />14 Ayes: Pust; �h1an; Roe and K:lausing. <br />15 Nays: �.ough. <br />16 Motion carried. <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />g. Comprehens�ve Plan Update — Consider Selection af Qual��ed <br />Firms to Seek Full Propasals for the 2008 Coznprehens�ve Plan <br />Update <br />Communi�y Deve�opment Dixectox John �tark re�iewed the receipt of <br />responses to fihe Ciiy's Reques� for Qualifications, in aceordance w�ih <br />City Council act�on and autho�iza�ion at their Apri1 � l, 2Q07 meeting. <br />25 Mr. Stark noted that s�aff had sent out 32 RFQ packages to consulting <br />26 firrns specia�izxng zn comprehensive planning; with eigh� responses; <br />27 two firms declining the �rojec�; and six �eam� submxtting their qualifi- <br />28 cations by �he May 18t deadline. Mr. Stark noted that those firms <br />29 submitting qualif cations inc�uded: Bonestroo, Hoisington Koeg�er <br />30 Group Inc. {HKGI), McCombs Frank Roos Associates, �nc. (1V�FRA), <br />31 4lsson AssoGiates, SRF Consuiting Group Inc. (SRF), and URS. <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />�S <br />11�r. Sta�rk noted �hat on Tune 4, 2007, representatives �rom th� Com- <br />munity Development, Paarks and Recrea�ion, and Public Works De- <br />partm�nts met �o review the quali�cat�ons of eaeh of the six teams, <br />and prior to the meeting, individuals were ask�d �o rank each team <br />based on the ieam's expearience, relevance o£ the pas� projec�s, and <br />overall quaiifications of the submittal. Following individua� rankings, <br />