Laserfiche WebLink
Regulaar City Council Mee�ing <br />Manday, Juue 11, ZOU7 <br />Page 33 <br />1 staf�'s cumu�a.t�ve rankings were completed, with three teams f�lt to <br />2 be qualified to present proposa�s: Sones�rvo, HKG�, and SRF. <br />3 <br />4 Mr. Stark noted that staff had prepa�red and included in tonighi's <br />5 pack��, a draft Request for Proposa�s {RFPj for Counci� review and <br />6 comment. M�. Stark clarified, �or public information and disclosure <br />7 purposes, that the �rm of Bones�oo inco�ora�ed the �rm formerly <br />8 known as DSU. <br />9 <br />�0 Diseussion included clear, cons�s�ent dem�rcations be�ween the top <br />� 1 �h�ee firms and other contenders; supermajoriiy vote for comp��hen- <br />12 sive p�an changes and recognition �ha� proposed individual Counci�- <br />1� member action i�ems wou�d seek that supermajority, r��her than at- <br />14 tempting to pursue ehanges with only a 3/2 vo�e; c�a�ificaiion of <br />15 Council direction to staff reg�rd�ng the RFQ process, with no formal <br />15 vote taken; and �nterpretation o� sfia�'f assumptions on those sectzons <br />17 needing rewriting versus seeking �ecommendation a�' the proposing <br />18 frms. <br />�9 <br />20 Councilmember Ihlan opined her laek of suppo� �'or needing the ex- <br />2� tent of the scape of s�rvices outlined by sta�'�; suggesting a much less <br />22 extensive update to meet 2008 deadline requirements. Counci�mem- <br />23 ber Ihlan further opined �hat the RFP needed to c��arly re�lec� individ- <br />24 ual Coune�lmember commen�s, not jus� �taff reeommendations. <br />25 � <br />26 Mayox Klausing noted tha� the Counci� had he�d discussions on the <br />27 extent of the �eview, with the Council s�eking a more intermediate <br />28 level of review as their prefer�ed op�on; and recognized the process <br />29 needing a 4/5 vote for any changes. Mayor Klausing spoke in support <br />30 of staf�'s sei�ction of �he three recommended finns. <br />3� <br />32 Additional discussion included th� use o�' the �ta�'� recommended <br />33 "cafetexia" approach to fi.he proposals; and the actual submission to the <br />34 IVle�ropolitan Council. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Roe opined that the intent of ihe proposed rewrite <br />37 was no� ta change the eontent as much as to change the pr�sen�ation <br />38 of the content. Counci�m�embez� Roe recognized �hat the community <br />39 visioning process may have creaied sorr�e potential content changes, <br />