My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0618_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0618_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:26:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Single-�amily F2esidentraf Lot Split Study Report May 14, 2007 <br />G. Tk�e Ciry Counci] shouId considex recom.bination. atad subsequent re-s�.bdivisian af single- <br />fazz�i.ly �eszderatia� lats no differenr�y than otl�ez subdivisaor� requests.(Consensus <br />Reca�enda�inn} <br />7.a. Tl�e City Council s�auld allaw the creat�p�a of flag �ots and cont��ue to hear t�em thxoug� <br />the variance process. (Majox.ity Recd�r�sraeziciatiar�—G vples) <br />7.b. T�e City Cauncil should prohrbit the c�eatiar� a� �ag lnts vaithin the City. (Minority <br />Recnzzar�endat.ioza-�--2 votes} <br />C. Zonin�Gacie <br />The C�ty Gou�c� should designate three levels of sing�e�fami.ly resid�n�iaZ znz�irz� ti�stxzcts, <br />wh.ich i€zclz�de the following districts: (Consensus Reca�zazne�zc�at�o�) <br />➢ Srnall lot single-�an�ily xesidextial, �rhicl� would have standards less than the currenC <br />standards; <br />➢ Standard singie-Earnily �esident�al, which �a�ld I�ave rhe sarne standards as the <br />current R1 distri.ct; and <br />➢ Lakeshore siz�gle-£azza�ly �-esidenta.al, wl�ch wauld �aa�e standards equaI ta that set <br />�arwazd in the City's Shoreland Zonizag Ordinance. <br />The Ci.ry Caunc�l should not ereate a laxge lot zoning district. (Consexasus Recorxune�dation) <br />3. When a srnall lot sin�le-fam�ly residential zoriing distxict is designated, the City Council <br />should revie�u t�ie sta��dards in the Zpni�ag Code for this ciistrict to eF�su�e approp�iate <br />b�ailcttng l�eight and se�backs requa.remezlts. (Cansens�s Recoxz�xzaenda�ior�} <br />4. In adc�iit�an tn the new zoning dist�icts, the Ciry Council should designate an overlay zotaia-ag <br />district fox single-fatz�iJ.� lc�ts platted pxiox ta May 21, 19�a9 to es�s�zie thax rhey rernaizi <br />legal�y noncon�azs�aing lots. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />The Cxty Gouncil si�ould evaluate the fees associate:d �xTith the existi�ag plaz�ned ura�t <br />de�relo�znetzt p�acess. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />C�. 'T'f-ie Czty Gour�ci.l sk�ould amend the prearnl�t� caf the Zoning Code v,�th the �o�towing <br />language: "...:Eor the pur�ase of protect�r�g and enhancir�g �he chaxacter, stability, and vitality <br />ofxesidezz�ial �eighborhoods as well as commercial axeas." (Coi�se:nsus Reco�nendation) <br />D. fltherC�t�„_Standards a�d Osdi�ar�ces <br />The City Courac� should consider crearing incentives fo� environrnenta�ly friendly <br />develapment practices. (Consensus �eca�endat�ion) <br />2. The City CoUnci� should consider a t�ee preservat�on a�d replacement ardfr�anee. <br />(Coz�sens�s Recpmznendation) <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.