Laserfiche WebLink
��� <br />�.���1� �����- <br />�� ��C��� <br />Summary �f I�o� Sp�it Comments Before the ��� Cauncil. <br />June 11� 24�7 <br />7C'aYn McGehee <br />The Lot Spli� Si�udy Group (CAG) an.d i�s attenda�at Final Repart raise severai important <br />pal'zcy issuss. Z`h.ese are discussed in detail in the attached znez�ozand�m. <br />1. What was the ��act scape of the stuc�y`? <br />If it was as stated on page 2, fhen mar�y of �he �ecomxnendatia�s, <br />regarding overlay zones, pre ar�d post 1959 lais, PUD fecs, greerz building, <br />a�ad tree p�eservatian, are clearlq beyond the scc�pe ofthe project. <br />2. Wlaa.t at�e t�ie de�ini�ons? <br />When a iypical resident discusses "lot sp�it" it ia a discussion o�' whethe� <br />or nnt a s�gle lot ca� be d'zvxded int� two sz�alle�r lots. Wh�z� <br />"su�divzsion" zs used, it is taicen by znast to imply an. ac�ai rede�vela��ent <br />o� three az� z�o�e �ts. A PUD �s sQ�ething tha� most residents knov� ve�y <br />little about and certainl� do not consic3er it as �art nf a"lo� split." T�e <br />p�rc�iase o��vo or more lots az�d the recombinatzon of those �ots az�cl <br />subsec�uent redivision of thase lats as a sn�bdivisio� o� PUD is alsn very <br />differe�t fram the cnmmnn terrninoiogy of "Iot split." <br />All nf t�ese t�rms, lnt split, Iot recornbinatian, PUD, subdivisian, �a�ve <br />dif�'exent �re�%atao:ns a�ac� �raeesse�, sarne a£ �hick� are opac�ue to m.ost <br />res�dents. Ta use these all und��r the �eading o� "loe split" is �isl�;ad�g. <br />3. What is th� prc�cess for inagortant policy deczsio�s? <br />As o�es hozne is the single most irnpprtant inves�nent �ost individuals <br />have, to attennpt ta rnalce �najor zoning e�anges in a 9fl day wi.nc�ow �s ztot <br />�in �e best interests of the commtu�iiy. This is an importa�t issue a.nd <br />sk�ould be de�t with as such. We just co�eluded the "visio�ning" �rocess. <br />'I`here is �o discussia� o£ �ot dzvi�ion or residez�t�al redeve�op�ae�t zn �he <br />�znal report. <br />�4. What is th� poliey �or e�tize� iz�put? <br />��. this case, sixty-nine residents signed some alternative ic�eas they v�ts�ed <br />to have considereci by the City Council. '�Che ideas were r�ot includecl. or� <br />��e "Lot Split Advisory" welasite where citizer�s could vieva therr�. In fact, <br />