My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0618_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0618_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:26:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1Vl�mo <br />To: City Council Members <br />Willxam Ma�inen, City Ma.nager <br />Faram. Ta� ii�cG�hee <br />Da�e: J�ne l l, �007 <br />Re: Written Statement of I.�ormation Pres�nted <br />Public Hearing, Juz�e I1, 2007 <br />�t sad and u.�foz-h�'ia�e tY�at cit�ens makin� s�gge�iic�ns to their �Iected o�cials on the <br />Ciiy Ce�uncil fnc� staff cantacting City Legal Co�sel in an obvia�s attempt to discredit <br />ei�izen suggestions hefore fihey are presen�ed at a publie hear�ng. This action bq staif <br />establishes au adversarial tone where none �was i�tendec# 4r desired. <br />The ideas az�d recann�endatio�as p�t forvvard xz� the citzze�.-based Ai�ern�tive Lot Split <br />Reco�endatiox�s were �ormu.lateci £allawing #�ae CAG publzc hea.�ng at�d #he sixty-nin� <br />res�den� signa�res were pbfiained in adva�.ce o�May 24. <br />Aft�r revi�wing the anaiysis docum��t it appea�rs t�at znuch ti.nne a.nd money would have <br />beez� saved iit�e Citiz�n Lot S�Iit Advisory Gro�.p (CACr) had heen aslced to study issut;s <br />that actually needed r�view and �o pravide a variety of different o�tions fc�r publie and <br />City Counsel discussion. A gr�ater sens� cs� cor�munity cau�cl have been encouraged by <br />fr��ly disseminating and discussin� variotxs recomm�ndations. <br />Th� Q�cial Recomm�ndations sper�d a great deal o�tirn�; providing a cou��lic�t�d <br />snIution ia a nfln-�xistent proble�n o�pre �d post 19S91ots. It is clear i� the e�isting <br />city cod� that �on-con�orming lat issues �were alrea�� afFectively handled in 1959 in <br />�ec�ion 10i2B r�f �.he cocle s�ating "a platted lot or paurcei of land of r�cord o:� May �1, <br />1959, �vhic�Z daes z��t rrzeet the rec�u�re�ae��s �f �s Cade as to �ea, wid�: or apen space <br />may be utilized �'or single-fa.rr�ily re��dential dweliing pu�pQS�s provided the <br />rr��asur�n�ents of suc� are, �d� or open space are withan seventy percent of the <br />requirements nf this aod�." Thus, non-coz�'oarz�n� lots af 7,70Q sf are legal, R-1 lots z£ <br />pIatted befaare 1959. <br />The exxs�ing code has also effecfively handlecl a.t�y �robl�ams arisir�g fronr� excess�vely <br />narraw lots. A1�ough the spec��r of mnr�gag� a�d insurance prab�ezns v�ras raised, it <br />appears u�founded as the exist�� code c�arifies the I�gaiity a�'such enti�i�s. <br />Where iwa a� rrzore contiguous vaeant lats are held in single ownership within a <br />subdivision whrch was duly recorded prior to May 21, 1959, which lots are <br />indivzdua2'ly not af the required mrnimum area ar width for the district in which <br />they are situated, no special exceptians shall be rec�uired for the issuance of <br />huilding permits provided that such lo�s shall be deveia�ed in g►�oups a� ft°actians <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.