Laserfiche WebLink
af g�oups, as single lats, to pravide the min�mum lat, f-antage and area required <br />for each structure. The purpase of this provision is ta permit utilizat�on of <br />isolaied recorded lots �vhich lack adequaie width or area so long a reasanabie <br />living standards can be provided and to wider� substanc�rd-si�ed vacant lots <br />whersvergracticable so that they �vzld be in harmony �vith the existing or <br />prajected character af the neighborhood in wh�ch they a�e siturxted. <br />7t folta�cvs that since the R-� Cnde enactec� in IVIay of 1959 stipulates that a� R-1 Iot �n�st <br />ha�re an 85 foat wid�, a 1 l� foot d�pt�, and 1�.,OQQ s�' area, houses caz�at be bualt on <br />"s�bstarid�d" az "nor�-caxzf'prnai�ag Lots" under the present eade. <br />Therei`oze, as t�e CAG and resider�ts were askecl ta co;rzsider a prable�n that did not �xist, <br />it ap�ears �at Ite�s l and 2 0£ th� Alternative Recamrxae�da�ions should be withdra�wn, <br />provided the orig�l code of 7959 is retained. Furthermore, thexe appea� tn be �o need <br />for CAG recom�endat�oz�s X,2,3, a�ad 4 o�Sect�on C, Zaa:ai.ng Code. <br />The �C�y ta Ia� splitting is �he statement in the 1959 coc�e "�o wzd�n suhstandard-sized <br />vacant lats wherever practzcab�e sn that t�ey will be �n harrnany with th� ���sti�g or <br />projecteci c�aracter of the neighborhood in which they are si�ated." 'T�aat goal, together <br />wi� the sta#ement recomxr��nded by ihe CAG in It�m 6 of Section C, Zn�g Code, "fo�r <br />the purpase ai protecting aad enhanci�.g t�.e charaeYer s�ability, and vi�ity af residex�tia.� <br />z�ei�bnrhoods..." assert a ci�:ar and strong reco�nrr��ndarion about neighborh�od <br />character. <br />The �dame�ta.l iss�e be�'oz�e t�� City of Rosevzlle regarc�izzg �ot splits is simple. w�at �s <br />�e bes� �way to rr�aix�.�.in z�eighbanc�aod character a�d provide �or liznxted lot s��its? To <br />address thzs one cauld lo€�k �o atl�er fully developed subur�is ar citzes t€� see �ow tl�s <br />c�uestion is addressed �here. <br />l. St. Pa�. has fiv� sing�e-farnily resider�#.ial dis�ricts a.�lawing for lots fro� 5,000 <br />s� ta 2l ,780 s£ Wit.�n �.iese distriets Pa�s car�. be no sr�zaller tY�an fihe c�esigz�ated <br />minimu�n. Variance i� granted on.ly in eases of e�re�e hardshi�. <br />2. IIop�i�ts �so lxa.s fave sin�.e-�a.m�l� res�dent�al di�iricts rang:€�g fra�z &,000 sf <br />to 4Q,400 sf. Again, wi�hin �hese districts �ats can be na smaller #han the designated <br />�x�i�auxx� with va�iance gra.nted only in cases af extreme hardsliip. <br />3. Minneapolis has a stated intent �o "rnaintain t�eighborhac�d character." It <br />hanciles �ot divisi4z� by a.liowing newly c�eated �ots to be no smailer tha.n t.�e avera�e o£ <br />�ots withi� a�50' zadius. Accardingly, i.zz an R-1 dist�ict o� 5,4t�0 sf zninirnum lots, a lot <br />divxs�an apglica�io� in an area where the lots in a 350 radi�s avexage 9,000 sf, division <br />ca.n fl�ly be grar��ed iith� lats creat�d are equal. ta o� gr�at�r �an 9,000 s£ Agaiz�, <br />vari.ane� �s gra�t�d o�ly in cases o�' e�trezne hards�i�. <br />Z <br />