Laserfiche WebLink
Regula� City Council 1Vleeting <br />�VJC@aid(�y, �T[��y �3y 2007 <br />Page 33 <br />1 Mr. Paschke adv�sed that t�e applicant had provided responses to <br />2 co�n�nents; and verxf�ed that t�ais EAVV was t�e same dxaft as provided <br />3 in Ias� w�ek's n�ee�ing packet. <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />IO <br />�1 <br />12 <br />�.3 <br />�.4 <br />�5 <br />Mayor Klausing opened th� meeting for public comment; asking that <br />comments be foeused on the n�ed far an EIS; or wh�thear the com� <br />ments on the �AW were accuxate; and whethe�r �he EAW was com- <br />plete or i� furth�r, and obtainable, in�orma�ion was needed. <br />Publ�c Comment <br />Randy Nepra�h <br />IVIr. Neprash cl�rified that he was speaking as a private citizen and nat <br />for the City's Public Works, Environment and Transportation (PWET) <br />Co�nmiss�an, o� which he was a mernber. <br />1� Mr. Nepxash xefere�.ced the memorandun� hy City Engineex Debxa <br />17 Bloom, and hex recornmendation� anc� comments from the last PWET <br />�.8 meeting. In the in�erest o� fiill disclosure, Mr. Neprash noted fhat the <br />19 PWET voted ta suppa�t the negative declaration on a 4/1 vote, and <br />20 that hi� was the dissen�ing vote. <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />Mr. Neprash no��d that at �he P"LNET mee�ing, agency and/or public <br />comments we�� not avazlab�e, nor were thcy part of �he consideration <br />and recommenclation a�ihe PWET, due to izming and proe�ss. <br />Mr. Neprash addressed concems that the college be held responsible <br />£oar their assurances in their response to commenfis thafi they would <br />wark toward ensuxing that a�l dir�ct and ind�xect discharges into Lake <br />Johanna were t�ea�ed approp��ately; and asked �or mo�e specif c lan- <br />guage and �den�i�'ication by the Col�ege o� those disc�arge locations. <br />Mr. Neprash addressed Ramsey County comments rela�ed to t�affc <br />miiigation issues; College participation and proportionaie or total <br />funding; and asked that specifc l�nguage be included that cla�ified the <br />Gol�ege's paz-t�czpation and responsibility �or such mitiga�ion. <br />37 Mr. Neprash addressed concerns, and a recom�nendation o�the PWF,T <br />38 that consideration be given far payment in lieu of taxes for p�op�rti�s <br />39 outside �he campus proper; sir�ce thos� properties had considc�able <br />