Laserfiche WebLink
12egular City Council Meetin� <br />M[a�day, Ju�� 23, 2007 <br />Page 49 <br />�. Counci�member Pust opined tha� staff had hea�d clea�ly, and x£ they <br />2 were not prepared by the Augus� 13, 2007 m�eting with an inc�us�ve <br />3 PU�D based on Council discussions, they wauld not bring the item <br />4 �'oxward a� that time. Councilmember Pust fur�he�r api�ed that she <br />5 didn't want tn se� a preeedent o� the City Council deiermining when <br />6 sp�cific items came be%re the City Council at specific meetings. <br />7 <br />8 Counci�xnembear Ih1an spoke zn support o�'th� motian; opining th�.t �h� <br />9 Cx�y Council n��ded to set its own agenda; and it was c�ear �he item <br />3. � would noi be ready by August 13, 2007. <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />2D <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />Rol� Call <br />Ay�s: �hlan and Knugh. <br />Nayse Pust; Ro�; and Klausing. <br />Motion �aa�ed. <br />b. Plann�dl i�nit Deve�opm�nt (Pi�.�ID) and Rezon�ng — Corns�der a <br />PUD ancl Rezoning for Cent Venture� a� 2700 Cievela�d Avenu� <br />Ciiy P�anner Thomas Paschke intz-oduced the request o�' Cent Ventur�s <br />and Amwest Development LLC (in coopera�ion with John Mueller, <br />property owner representative) for a Prelimznazy Plat, Rezoning, and <br />Ge�eara� Concept P�anned Unit Deve�opment �o redevelap the Xtra <br />Lease tz�ucking site, 2700 Cleveland Avenue, into a hotel and z�estau� <br />rant (PFQ7-021). <br />26 Mr. Paschke advised that the Ci�y's Txa�f c Consulting Engineer, N.�r. <br />27 Vaughan with SRF Consulting, was pr�s�nt to co�nrnent on the tra�f c <br />28 study; and also nated that 3ahn Livingston, �otellRestaurant Appl�- <br />29 ca�t, 270d Cleveland Av�nue, and Rob�rt Hajek, Xtra Lcas�, repre- <br />30 senting owner of the trucking site (o�f ce address: 3�33 Broadway <br />31 Street NE, Surte � X 0, Minneapol�s, MN 554 � 3) were present. <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />Mr. Paschke advz,sed tha� sta�'� remained consistient in their recom- <br />mendation £o� DENIAL o� the request, based on �he fzndings detai�ed <br />in Section � 1.1 A of the staff report da�ed Ju�y 23, 2007. <br />37 Counci�member �h�an questioned whethear or not an envixanm�ntal xeT <br />38 view was required, that the Council's call for a diseretionary EAW by <br />39 the applicant would hald the 60-day calendar versus staf�'s recom� <br />