Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />5 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />IO <br />I1 <br />�2 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />�9 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />3 �. <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />4� <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />45 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />iegally tied to rezoning, and znning classi�ca�iq�s based nn meriis of flexibility for <br />allowable uses. <br />5taff noted the eonsideration of adjaeent parcels and their specific znning; as wefi as <br />rezoning in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />Appticant, Stephani Sunc[ry, Praject Partner and Pri�cipal with TOL[� <br />Ms. Sundry aoncurred with siaff's in�erpretaiior� of ihe B-1-B and B-2 zanir�g <br />consideratians; and express�d the applicant's interest in beeaming pa�t of ihe <br />Ros�viile corr�munity and limited locations where their specific user would "fit" into the <br />City. <br />Public Comment <br />Chad 1"hamas, 13766 94` Avenue N, representing property own�r on north, 2780 <br />Snet[ing (multi-tenant oifice building) <br />Mr. Thomas provided preliminary suppart from the lan�lard ofi the office properiy far <br />the praposed use and zoning req�aest; and expressed their enthusi�sm far a"weicorne <br />change" to the currently degraded and blighted prnperty, and noted the nurnber of <br />nega#ive aftributes and vandalism currently being experienced from the vaeant <br />property. <br />Mr. �'hornas advised that there were several items on the Siie Plan �hat vuere of minor <br />concern to the praperty owner, b�t expressed generaf support nf #he applicatian, and <br />volun#eered to work with staff on those mir�or concerns to achieve resol�ation. <br />Chair Bakeman clnsed the Public Hearing. <br />MOTION <br />Mennber �aiceman maved, �ecanded �y Mem�er Wozniafc to R�COMMEND <br />APPROVAL of the request E�y T4LD. �evelapment to RE2QNE propert.y at from <br />BW1-B (Limited Retail �istrict} to B-Z (Retail B�sin�ss �istrictj, based an the <br />com�nents af Sectian 5 of the project r�:port dated July �1, 200T. <br />Commissioner Boerigter reiierated his cnnc�rns about the need fo rezor�e at this time; <br />not tanderstanding the rationale for the presurr�ed dif�erences ar�d why they existed. <br />Mr. B�erigter recognized staff's point nn th� his#ory of a�areel; however, pres�med <br />tha� w�er► the City zoned a particular property in a particular way, there was rafiionale <br />in that decision <br />Corr�missioner Uoherty cancurred with Commissioner Boerigfer's ra�ionale and <br />expressed his personal preference similar to thai; however questior�ed tf�e <br />Commission's abiliiy tp tie rezaning to a specific Site Plan. Comrr�issianer poher�y <br />supportec[ lonking at the process in the future to cfarify and sireamline the reznning <br />process. Commissioner Boerigter opined that the Commission was nat abligaied io <br />rezone khe property at this time. <br />Further discussion ensu�d regarding the nutraber af uses thai would be allowed in <br />addition to a speciaity grocery store. <br />Cnmmissioner Gasongo clarified the requested aciion and future rezoning proeess <br />considerations ta pravide more ciear distinctio�s and avaid overlaps in zoning <br />distriets. Commissinner Gasongo spoke in suppori of ma�ing forward wi�h �his <br />application, and look in the future ati a possible text revision. <br />Mr. Stark clarifisd tihat fihis rezoning request was in eompliance with the <br />Cnmprehensive F'lan, unlike a single-family residenfial io multi-family residential <br />