My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0123_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0123_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:38:12 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:30:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
upgrading of existing homes. If they are in conflict with the original code, the original code <br />applies. <br />There are some specifics and a few new provisions, such as a section on overcrowding and a <br />section on smoke alarms, which were intended to apply mainly to rental properties (these are <br />new provisions and therefore not in conflict with the code the structure was originally built <br />under). The Smoke Alarm topic was amended to apply to rentals only, overcrowding was not <br />amended in this way. Overcrowding should be amended to apply �}ril r� to rentals. <br />As an option, we could amend Section 1013 'Intent' to state that 'the intent is to allow <br />existing structures, in conlpliance with the code under which they were built, to continue <br />without change except for tl�e additional life-safe(a� and health requiremEnts that apply to <br />rental properties.' This way the IPMC would still address owner-occupied homes that are in <br />disrepair (which is what we need), and also more directly address and regulate rental <br />properties. <br />� Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.