My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0123_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0123_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:38:12 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:30:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2 Roseville's City Code, Section 108 states the same: <br />.. . <br />} 1_1 �,_.1.,._F.. �_ .._... ._ . __.. #. _ y .. - r--.y <br />• �.�iiayLfi�:� . � �Ti�i}i� � �� i J }��iii � �Y�Lr •4 iii� �fJf�Ll <br />�Zi T i �u <br />i.�r/��FlJ �J ��{+�a,� ��� ��Iti���+ ..T{�■+� J+� 4�i ���•fi+ ��� �a � L�F� J rL1+.`� L•.�,4r�i�+ J�� <br />�C{..J'1Z ��LL � x'' L�S, J' �'LfLLL V� , J} Y L�,- .��?�J J�I.J L' �L� L L'iZ r I..i L L f L2{� <br />r <br />��a�.::ir�g �'r,�r-r;���i�o� �na.i � :��l�i::�: �:.�L�v���=��: �iear:in�. _. A3l <br />pa�ties inte�ested shall be given an oppo�tunity to be <br />hea�d. The Planning Commission, afte� citing the �eason, may <br />�equest the City Council to extend the �eview pe�iod fo� up <br />to s ix ty (60) days. <br />�i� �'��f�� ��� ���}�c� �� ��a° ��r�� an� ����� �f s�;�n F=a�r�ng <br />s�!a ���� ���� � sn ��1 i� vn V a��s� gna t e� 3��a? n e����a��r� n� <br />� ��� -��fl -��M��i��� M��~ m�rc �'����3��-' ���� ... � �s p��� '-�c <br />�F: � �i��r� �g. <br />�a� CJJ� �Y��av 6�ii� 1�v�1I11� �JJYv+�Y�a.F � YJ���1LLIaL�1 L+L�}Ls�, i�� <br />?�r��F �.r����e� ���ti�� s�l��x? I �e� �x� �•�rs ��}f . C�e �i.�.µ ;.:; r'..T:�� <br />�?x„ �r �n� �� eae � c�f � r!:e �r �r�e r � ��.:�:�«�*�� _.����ir�=�:-�hree <br />��r��ir�r�-� �� ���, .��.� t....r��.Y.f.��. . �,�, .�,F,�.������+_ror�arri ��_ �t -•�:c <br />�d�3��y1 w t � �i1 e .7 �C3 4� f 4 r'���• ��r � a � � � 4 <br />applicable. Failu�e to r�tail notice <br />23 In addition to the printed notice in the Roseville Review and the mailed notice, all <br />agendas (and staff reports) are available on the city web site the Friday before the <br />meeting. Meetings are televised and minutes are available on the web. The practice of <br />setting mailing distances is an art — recognizing that more mailings in a physically <br />connected neighborhood are better that fewer. In past years we have also used on-site land <br />use notice boards. These are more visible in the non-snowy months when they are not <br />blown over by wind or snow plows. <br />2.4 Comparisons: If the Council chooses to change the City Code, here are some examples of <br />what might be expected. The staff estimates that each mailed notice costs in excess of <br />$0.50 including paper, copying, card setup, handling and address labels setup, and <br />mailing. For illustrative purposes we have used $0.50 to $1.00 per card. While our staff <br />can do this efficiently, there is also some lost time and opportunity cost that is not <br />calculated here. The 2006 Community Development budget for notification is $1,950.00 <br />to include mailing and published notices. <br />2.5 Below are four examples (Kimco Realty — Franks; Jeff Brown — Oakcrest @ Harnline; <br />Target Corporation — Supertarget/Perkins; and Rottlund Homes —Phase I Twin Lakes) of <br />the estimated cost of mailing out general public notices. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.