Laserfiche WebLink
(;!,! 1"�1 <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />CC: <br />Subject: <br />���Ci�"��rt� ��Cv''P.�''dd�'� G-�� <br />� <br />Neal Bee#s <br />Monday, Nouernber Oi, 2QQ5 1p:25 AM <br />Caro! Sfetner <br />Randy ,inhnsnn <br />Gr�en Mill liquor decisit�n;VFW iiquor decision;Old Chicago iiq�.or decision <br />p �b� <br />�� �� <br />, <br />� � ,.;;ry�� <br />Grsen �lill liquor VFW lic�uor 41d Chicago Iiqunr <br />decision.do.,. �ecision.cioe (35 KB..e decision.d... <br />� <br />FYI, I sent ou� the fnllnwing decisions Iast week. I knaw they are not yaur pareferenc e but, all things <br />eonsidered, I thought this was t�e hest approach, <br />I do have a sol�tion for the firture. 4r actualiy, the Code has a solutinn. Nathing in �he Code authorizes zx�e to <br />hear these appeals wher� vialators object tQ t�e �enalty set �'orth in the Cod�. The Co,�e says the appeal is to the <br />Councii. I da�'� think ti�at is a vezy wise use af Gauncil time and resources...but the ]a�v is the law. <br />Therefore, please modify il�s v�olatior� letter to indicate tkza� liqt�ox establishments may appeal tl�e violation to <br />the Czty Cauncal by sending a letter to you by a certain date. The iei#er should inc�ud� a surnmary �rom the <br />liquor establishrnen� about tkze factual ar legal basis for �heir appeal. Then, we need to a�endize �he itern for a <br />Cou�ncil Mee�ing and do a shart RCA explainin� t�e violat�on; t�e City Attarney vvill have ta do or say <br />something aho�t the scape of the Cnuncii's authority to n:�odify the penalty set farth i�� the Cocie. <br />Tl�anlcs. <br />e <br />� <br />a <br />i <br />� <br />