My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0213_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0213_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:28:02 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:31:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mohon #2 <br />All provisians of the 1'PMC adopted as part of the Rosevzlle City Code shall be fully stated as part of the <br />city code, not by reference to the IPMC, <br />The International Praperry Maintenance Code is a licensed "product" of the International <br />Codes Councii, not a publie docuzx�ent. Ta make sure that resid��ts can have full access to <br />our local Iaws, If Roseville decides to adopt provisions of the IMPC, we should write them <br />into our Code, as Shoreview did. Also attached is the Frzdley Residential Rental Properry <br />Maint�nance and Licensing Code, which also adopts �MPC standards directly into ciry <br />ordinance. <br />Motioan #3 <br />Adapt anly Chapters 2-7 of the IMPC, after additianal public hea�ing at the HRA ar council tn revietiv <br />and consider possibte aryeendrrtents to the specz.'fic maintenance standards of t72ose ch�pters. Delete and <br />da not adopi Chapter T(Administration%. Leave existing adYninistration and enforcement ordinances <br />and policies in place. <br />As discussed above, Shoreview has adopted many of the maintenance standards fro�n the <br />IMPC, but not the adrninistration and enforcement pravisions. Hopkins is anoth�r example <br />of this -�-- see Hopkins Property Maintenance Code attached. Hopkins has its own. <br />campliance and enforcement ord'anancea in place of IMPC Chapter 1, and has also deleted <br />or amended a sigr�zficant nunr�ber of t�.e TMPC �aintenax�ce standards in Chapter� 3-7. <br />If Roseville adopts alI af the administ�ation/e�forcement provisions of tihe IMPC, the result <br />will be the creatinn of a new city department of praperry maintenance with broad pa�wers of <br />entry and inspection of aII prop�rty, and greater power to punish violatoars (thraugh <br />prosecution of strict Iiabiliry rnisdemeanors). No evidence or reasons have been presented <br />to show a need or justify this. Wl�y not foeus on upclating and st�engthening maintenance <br />standards first, and review enforcernent mechanisms if necessary afterward? <br />Motion #4 <br />Delete Sectian 101.2 (Scope) and amend it to clarify that the code applies only to exterior maintenance <br />ofowner occupz'ed structures and that inte�ior standards and inspections apply only as to rental <br />licensing requirements. <br />This wouId make the scope of the maintenance eode consistent with staffrecommendations. <br />Motion #5 <br />l�elete Section 104.4 (Right of Entry) <br />Instead, create inspection rights and procedures as part of the rentallicensing code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.