Laserfiche WebLink
without a variance. <br />Member poherty expressed concern about c�rai�aage, especially on the west end adjacent <br />to Parcel A and cozzcern about adverse iinpacts in the neighborhood. The house to the <br />west wiil app�ar dwarfed by tl�e new hoanes. <br />Mo�ion L• Chair Traynor moved, second by Member pol�erty, to recommend denial <br />of t1�e variance because a variance wilI impact the character o�t1�e neighborhood and <br />will not be needed without the prapos�d st�bdivision, at�c� the need for the �ariance is <br />created by the applicant. <br />Member Bakeman said she was not concerned with Pa�cel A, which meet� all <br />requirerr�ents, and Parce� C could be created in many different ways. <br />Member Wozniak explained that Parcel A meets the legal requirements. On Parcel C he <br />felt that was little visual iznpact on County Road B homes since most are smaller and <br />would be similar. He asked where the utility service for the existing hoz�rze comes frorn <br />{Cou�ty Road B) and could Parcels B and C be turned ta an east-w�st alignrnent. <br />Vate on Motion 1: <br />Ayes:l Nays:3 Abstain:0 <br />Motion failed. 1 to 3. <br />Mc�tion 2: Member Bakeman maved, secand by Wozniak to recommend approval of a <br />15 foot cnrner [ot width variance to Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensianal <br />Requirements) for new Parcel "C" for prope�rty located at 2159 County Road "B" based on <br />the findings in Section 5 of the praject report and subjecfi to the conditions within Section 6 <br />report dated January 4, 2006, and with an additi�nal conditiar� requiring Rice Creeic <br />Watershed review prior to issuance of any buzlding permits. <br />Ayes:3 Nays: 1 Abstain:0 <br />Mation carried. 3-1 <br />Mation 3: Member Bakeman inoved, second by Dob�erty to recommend approval of <br />a minor subdir�ision (Three Parcei Minor Subdivision (City Code Section 1104.04E} <br />creating three new parcels �1, B, aiid C(Parcel "B" to have the existi�g house) with a <br />parcel size af at Iea�t 15,000 s.f. based on the finctings in Section S and subject to the <br />conditions of Section 6 of tlle project report dated Januaiy 4, 200b, and with an additional <br />condition requiaring Rice Creek Watershed review prior to issuance of any building <br />permits. <br />Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: Q <br />Mofiion carried. 4-0 <br />RCA PP3699(022706) - Page 9 of 9 <br />