Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 2 <br />r <br />Rosevi I le Eth ics Task Force Report <br />April 23 , 2002 <br />Background <br />Upon recommendation by Roseville Mayor John Kysylycayn and <br />subsequently by a February 4, 2002 motion of the Roseville City Council, <br />the Ethics Task Force was created to undertake an independent review of <br />the Ethics Commission Resolution. Its review would include an <br />examination of the Commission's history, its goals and procedures, and <br />result in recommendations regarding its operations. <br />The Ethics Task Force met on March 12, Apri12, and Apri123, of 2002. <br />All five members of the Task Force were present at each meeting: Chair <br />David Schultz, Ann Berry, Craig Klausing, Connie Pease, and Deon <br />Stuthman. The minutes of those meetings are attached as Exhibit A. <br />Although receiving general public comment was not part of the Task <br />Force's charge from the City Council, the Task Force did hear from the <br />Mayor and from all members of the Roseville Ethics Commission, the <br />standing ethics citizens' advisory commission. <br />In addition, the Task Force reviewed a notebook of material dealing with <br />public ethics and municipal ethics codes and structures. <br />This report, its findings and recommendations are endorsed by all of the <br />Task Force's members. <br />Findings <br />Based upon this input and our deliberations, the Task Force makes the <br />following findings [references in parentheses O refer to the meetings at <br />which the topics were discussed, or describe authority for the finding]: <br />A. Roseville has had an Ethics Commission since July 23, 1990. <br />(Resolution 8593) <br />B. In the first five years of its existence, that is from 1990 through <br />1995, the Commission received two ethics complaints: one dealt <br />with the decision process associated with the construction of the <br />John Rose Minnesota OVAL and was dismissed by the <br />Commission; the second complaint dealt with a political concern <br />and was withdrawn by the complainant. (March 12, 2002 Meeting) <br />C. In the last year, the Ethics Commission received six ethics <br />� complaints: <br />