My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0320_Packet_Study
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0320_Packet_Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:23:50 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
* the Commission dismissed summarily as lacking merit four <br />complaints dealing with allegations of unethical expenditures cf <br />city funds; <br />+ the Council dismissed due to insufficient evidence one complaint <br />dealing with allegations of unethical use of influence; <br />* the sixth complaint dealing with allegations of abuse of power was <br />withdrawn by the complainant. <br />There were no ethics complaints filed with the Commission <br />between 1995 and 2001.. (March 12 and Apri123, 2002 Meetings) <br />D. The Ethics Commission plays a valuable educational and <br />informational role in the community. It raises awareness of the <br />fundamental importance in our democracy of government officials <br />and citizen advisory commission members understanding and <br />practicing good ethics. (AllMeetings) <br />E. The Ethics Commission plays an important role in financial <br />disclosure. Through the ethics resolution, many public officials are <br />required to report significant financial interests each year. Such <br />reporting helps avoid conflicts of interest and builds public trust in <br />their public officials. (All Meetings) <br />F. The Ethics Commission plays an important role in reviewing <br />periodically the standards of ethical conduct with which public <br />officials mu s t comply. (All Meetings) <br />G. The investigatory role of the Ethics Commission i� problematic <br />because it is a volunteer body that lacks subpoena power. <br />However, the Task Force does not recommend granting the <br />Commission subpoena power. (AllMeetings) <br />H. The Ethics Commission presently has the capacity to differentiate <br />complaints made to it that are substantive from those that are <br />political in nature. However, its ability to judiciously and fairly <br />review all complaints it receives could be enhanced by clarification <br />of the requirements of-the ethics code and the procedures <br />employed to review complaints. [Apri12, 2002 meeting) <br />Recommendations <br />In light of these findings, the Ethics Task Force makes the following <br />recommendations: <br />l. That the City Council enlarge the enabling authority of the <br />Ethics Commission to authorize the Commission to review <br />� <br />h <br />� <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.