My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0410_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0410_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:02:16 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
����� <br />��,` � , � � _ � � <br />Friday, October 28, 2005 <br />Susan Mahon, Manager <br />Roseville Post No. 7555 <br />1145 Waodhill Drive <br />Roseville, MN 5 5113 <br />Re: Liquor License <br />Dear M s . Mahon. <br />This is my response to your appeal from the Police Chiefs August ���"� <br />notice informing you of your failure to pass an alcohol compliance check. <br />My response is based upon the entire record in this case, including the <br />hearing on Tuesday, September 27�', with you and the VF�vV Commander. <br />Based on that record, I make the following findings of facts. <br />On August 12, 2005, your employee, Erin Elizabeth MeDonnaugh, was <br />cited by the Roseville Police Department for serving alcohol to an under- <br />aged individual. The VFW does not contest the fact that this violation <br />took place. Your server did indeed provide alcohol to a minor. <br />Accordingly, the Police Chief sent you a notice fining you $500 and <br />suspending your liquor license for one-day. This is the penalty <br />prescribed under the Roseville City Code. (Yourestablishment did not <br />qualify for a lesser sanction under the City Code because you do not <br />participate in the City's Optional Manager and Server Training Program. <br />Participants in that Program are subject to lesser sanctions for liquor <br />violations in return for licensees carrying out a robust and aggressive <br />liquor training program for each employee who serves alcohol.) <br />At the hearing you presented certain information in mitigation of the <br />violation. Specifically, you explain that your server knew the Roseville <br />officer performing the compliance check and she assumed the officer <br />would not tolerate an under-age youth requesting alcohol. Therefore, <br />your server assumed the individual was not under-age and she provided <br />liquor without checking the individual's identification. <br />For the following reasons, I have decided to accept the mitigation <br />testimony: <br />2660 Civic Center Drive � Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br />651-792-ROSE � TDD 651-792-7399 � �nTww.cX.xoseville.mn.us <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.