Laserfiche WebLink
City Cou�acil Regular Meeting — 03127106 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 18 <br />��. <br />a� <br />L� <br />r <br />, <br />� <br />i <br />� <br />Councilmember Maschlta clarified that current demographics <br />support the average age in Roseville to be 50 years of age; and <br />noted that in the past Vista 2000 process, the City <br />Cou��cilnlemb�rs attended all brainstorming sessions. <br />Councilme�nber Maschka spoke in support of initiating the <br />process now, not later, and getting it started immediately as <br />proposed. <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her concerns as addressed in her <br />nlemorandum previously referenced. _ _ _ <br />- - �- � �� - . ��� <br />E't;�[ �n���ccl, Maschlta seconded, authorizing staff to prepare and <br />issue Requests for Proposals (R�'P'�} for publication as soon as <br />possible; but by April 10, 2006, consistent with Version 4 of the <br />Visioning Memorandum discussed at this meeting; and for staff <br />and the City Attorney to further research and provide a <br />determination regarding <br />used from the Housing <br />�Y���S ...,�= � .: <br />���,..__ � <br />Date: 04l I 0106 <br />Item: 11. <br />Visioning Process <br />Steering Committee <br />_� <br />whether or not and how funds can be ` <br />and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) �'�� <br />�. ,-- � . . _ . -'�_�.-�' <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her opinion that the City Council <br />didn't have a visioning process before the�n; and such process <br />needed approval prior to seel�ing �tFP's and the RFP process. <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the motion as stated. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the motion, opining that by <br />voting in favor of the motion, the Council was indicating their <br />preference for the proposal as presented. <br />Councilmember Pust noted that the City Council would have the <br />opportunity to evaluate proposals as submitted. <br />Co�.inciln�ember Ihlan sought to have the City Council review the <br />RF1''s prior to staff issuing thein, and as a compromise, proposed <br />a friendly amendment. <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, a friendly amendment that the <br />RFP be submitted to the City Council for their review prior to <br />issuance. <br />