My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006_0424_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2006
>
2006_0424_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:17:21 AM
Creation date
8/26/2009 3:33:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 04/17/06 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 10 <br />Council agendas, but that they were processed through the <br />City Manager to manage time effectively with staff <br />performing the day-to-day work and they were expected to <br />generate relevant information to the City Council to allow <br />informed decision-making. <br />Councilmeinber Ihlan conceded that the City Manager's <br />repoi-ts provided a preview of upcoming agenda items. <br />S.e Request of Councilmember Ihlan to Consider the <br />Community Development Director Position <br />Councilmember Ihlan addressed her preference to add a <br />motion to the regular business meeting of April 24, 2006 <br />proposing that the position vacancy be frozen until the City <br />Council has an opportunity to review and consider <br />restructuring the position. Councilmember Ihlan noted <br />that, while the City Manager made hiring decisions, the <br />City Council made policy decisions and all positions <br />should be reviewed by the City Council when they became <br />vacant and prior to reauthorizing rehiring a position. <br />Discussion included the Community Development <br />Department's current structure; potential vacancy in the <br />City Manager position and possible combination of those <br />positions; the Assistant City Manager position and possible <br />reinstatement of the position; and expanding the position <br />description of the Community Development Director to <br />include not just land use, but city-owned facility <br />management. <br />Councilmember Kough concurred with Councilmeinber <br />Ihlan's recommendation expressing his preference for <br />employees hired by the City, rather than consulting services <br />to better control costs to the City. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that, while it inade sense to <br />always and continually re-evaluate positions and that the <br />City Council be available to provide input regarding the <br />positions and their structure, she was not supportive of <br />freezing hiring for management positions when doing so <br />may inhibit the day-to-day business of the City. <br />Councilmember <br />Ihlan <br />Consider the <br />Community <br />Development <br />Director Position <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.